RAJU VIJAY MANWANI, MUMBAI v. DCIT 20(2), MUMBAI

ITA 3914/MUM/2012 | 2007-2008
Pronouncement Date: 15-10-2013 | Result: Dismissed

Appeal Details

RSA Number 391419914 RSA 2012
Assessee PAN AACPM5128P
Bench Mumbai
Appeal Number ITA 3914/MUM/2012
Duration Of Justice 1 year(s) 4 month(s) 11 day(s)
Appellant RAJU VIJAY MANWANI, MUMBAI
Respondent DCIT 20(2), MUMBAI
Appeal Type Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date 15-10-2013
Appeal Filed By Assessee
Order Result Dismissed
Bench Allotted D
Tribunal Order Date 15-10-2013
Date Of Final Hearing 05-05-2017
Next Hearing Date 05-05-2017
Assessment Year 2007-2008
Appeal Filed On 04-06-2012
Judgment Text
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL D BENCH MUMBAI . . . ! ' # BEFORE SHRI I.P. BANSAL JM AND RAJENDRA AM ./ I.T.A. NO. 3914/MUM/2012 ( $ $ $ $ % % % % / ASSESSMENT YEARS : 2007-08 SHRI RAJU VIJAY MANWANI FLAT NO.3 EMPIRE BUILDING LOKHANDWALA COMPLEX ANDHERI (W) MUMBAI -53 $ $ $ $ / VS. THE DCIT CIR.20(2) MUMBAI. & ' ./ ' ./ PAN/GIR NO. : AACPM 5128P ( &( / APPELLANT ) .. ( )*&( / RESPONDENT ) &( + / APPELLANT BY: NONE )*&( + / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI D. PRABHAKAR REDDY $ -' / DATE OF HEARING : 15/10/2013 ./% -' / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 15/10/2013 0 / O R D E R PER I.P.BANSAL J.M: THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. IT IS D IRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY LD. CIT(A)-31 MUMBAI DATED 30/03/2012 F OR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08. 2. NOTICE WAS SENT TO THE ASSESSEE FOR HEARING ON 15/10/2013. HOWEVER ON THE FIXED DATE OF HEARING NONE WAS PRESENT ON BEH ALF OF THE ASSESSEE. NO ADJOURNMENT APPLICATION WAS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. THEREFORE IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE WE PRESUME THAT THE AS SESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THIS APPEAL. FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL REPORTED IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD.38 ITD 3 20 (DEL) AND THE DECISION OF THE HONBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE C ASE OF ESTATE OF LATE ./ I.T.A. NO. 3914/MUM/2012 ( $ $ $ $ % % % % / ASSESSMENT YEARS : 2007-08 2 TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT 223 ITR 480 (M.P) WE DIS MISS THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE. 3. IN THE RESULT THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 15/10/2013 . 0 ./% ' 1 2$3 15/10//2013 / 4 SD/- SD/- ! (RAJENDRA) . . (I.P.BANSAL) ' /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER /JUDICIAL MEMBER MUMBAI; 2$ DATED 15/10/2013 . $ . .VM SR. PS 0 0 0 0 )-56 )-56 )-56 )-56 7 6%- 7 6%- 7 6%- 7 6%- / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. &( / THE APPELLANT 2. )*&( / THE RESPONDENT. 3. 8 ( ) / THE CIT(A)- 4. 8 / CIT 5. 694 )-$ / DR ITAT MUMBAI 6. 4: ; / GUARD FILE. 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ / BY ORDER *6- )- //TRUE COPY// < << < / = = = = (DY./ASSTT. REGISTRAR) / ITAT MUMBAI