Appeal Details
| RSA Number | 11021714 RSA 2017 |
|---|---|
| Assessee PAN | xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Bench | xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Appeal Number | xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Duration Of Justice | 11 month(s) 11 day(s) |
| Appellant | xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Respondent | xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Appeal Type | Income Tax Appeal |
| Pronouncement Date | 27-12-2017 |
| Appeal Filed By | Assessee |
| Tags | No record found |
| Order Result | Dismissed |
| Bench Allotted | D |
| Tribunal Order Date | 27-12-2017 |
| Date Of Final Hearing | 05-07-2017 |
| Next Hearing Date | 05-07-2017 |
| First Hearing Date | 05-07-2017 |
| Assessment Year | 2011-2012 |
| Appeal Filed On | 16-01-2017 |
| Judgment Text |
In The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal D Bench Chennai Before Shri A Mohan Alankamony Accountant Member Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy Judicial Member I T A No S 110 And 111 Mds 2017 Assessment Year 20 1 1 1 2 2012 13 M S Shiva Distilleries Ltd No 1212 Trichy Road Coimbatore 641 018 Pan A A Ccs 7199 B Vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Corporate Circle 2 C Oimb Atore Appellant Respondent Appellant By None Respondent By Mrs S Vijayaprabha J Cit Date Of Hearing 0 7 12 201 7 Date Of P Ronouncement 27 12 201 7 O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy Judicial Member Both The Appeal S Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against Different Orders Of The Ld Commissioner Of Income Tax Appeals 1 C Oimbatore Both Dated 3 1 1 0 201 6 Relevant To The Assessment Year S 20 1 1 1 2 And 2012 13 2 The Appeal S Of The Assessee Were Posted For Hearing Initially On 0 6 03 2017 By Service Of Notice At The Request Of The Ld Ar The Hearings Of The Appeals Have Been Adjourned From 06 03 2017 To 05 12 2017 When The I T A No S 110 111 M 1 7 2 Appeals Were Taken Up For Hearing On 05 12 2017 Again At The Request Of The Ld Ar The Hearing Was Adjourned To 07 12 2017 And By Endorsing In The Order Sheet The Ld Counsel For The Assessee Has Noted The Date Of Hearing However When The Appeals Were Taken Up For Hearing On 07 12 2017 N One Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Nor Any Adjournment Petition Has Been Filed Hence It Is Inferred That The Assessee Is Not Interested In Prosecuting The Appeal S 3 Therefore Having Regard To Rule 19 2 Of Itat Rules And Following The Decision Of The Delhi Bench Of The Tribunal In The Case Of Multiplan India Ltd 38 Itd 320 And The Judgment Of The Hon Ble Madhya Pradesh High Court In The Case Of Late Tukojirao Holkar 223 Itr 480 The Appeal S Of The Assessee Are Dismissed For Want Of Prosecution 4 In The Result Both The Appeal S Filed By The Assessee Are Dismissed Order Pronounced On The 27 Th December 201 7 At Chennai Sd Sd A Mohan Alankamony Accountant Member Duvvuru Rl Reddy Judicial Member Chennai Dated The 27 1 2 201 7 Vm Copy To 1 Appellant 2 Respondent 3 Cit A 4 Cit 5 Dr 6 Gf
|