V.Muthuraman, L/H to M.Vairavan, Madurai v. DCIT, Madurai

ITA 1142/CHNY/2017 | 2009-2010
Pronouncement Date: 30-11-2017 | Result: Dismissed

Appeal Details

RSA Number 114221714 RSA 2017
Assessee PAN AALPV5908P
Bench Chennai
Appeal Number ITA 1142/CHNY/2017
Duration Of Justice 6 month(s) 25 day(s)
Appellant V.Muthuraman, L/H to M.Vairavan, Madurai
Respondent DCIT, Madurai
Appeal Type Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date 30-11-2017
Appeal Filed By Assessee
Tags No record found
Order Result Dismissed
Bench Allotted D
Tribunal Order Date 30-11-2017
Assessment Year 2009-2010
Appeal Filed On 05-05-2017
Judgment Text
IN THE INCOME - TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL D BENCH CHENNAI . BEFORE SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI S. JAYARAMAN ACCOU NTANT MEMBER ./ I.T.A.NO. 1142/MDS/2017 / ASSESSMENT YEAR :20 09 - 1 0 SHRI V. MUTHURAMAN L/H TO M. VAIRAVAN NO. 9 HARVEY NAGAR ARASARADI MADURAI 625 016. [PAN: A A LPV5908P ] VS. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX NON CO RPOR ATE CIRCLE 3 MADURAI. ( / APPELLANT ) ( / RESPONDENT ) / APPELLANT BY : NONE / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI VIJAYAKUMAR PUNNA ST. COUNSEL / DATE OF HEARING : 27 . 1 1 .201 7 / DATE OF P RONOUNCEMENT : 30 . 1 1 .201 7 / O R D E R PER DUVVURU RL REDDY JUDICIAL MEMBER : THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX MADURAI DATED 29 .0 3 .201 7 RELEVA NT TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 20 09 - 1 0 PASSED UNDER SECTION 263 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961 [ ACT IN SHORT] . 2. THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE WAS INITIALLY POSTED FOR HEARING ON 13 .0 7 .2017 BY SERVICE OF NOTICE [RPAD ON RECORD]. AT THE REQUEST OF THE LD. I.T.A. NO. 1142 /M/ 17 2 COUNSE L FOR THE ASSESSEE THE HEARING OF THE APPEAL WAS ADJOURNED TO 14.09.2017. AGAIN AT THE REQUEST OF THE LD. COUNSEL THE HEARING OF THE APPEAL WAS ADJOURNED TO 27.11.2017 AND BOTH PARTIES HAVE BEEN INFORMED. MOREOVER THE LD. COUNSEL HAS ALSO ENDORSED IN T HE ORDER SHEET HAVING NOTED THE DATE OF HEARING. W HEN THE APPEAL WAS TAKEN UP FOR HEARING ON 27.11.2017 NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY ADJOURNMENT PETITION HAS BEEN FILED. HENCE IT IS INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSE CUTING THE APPEAL. 3. THEREFORE HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF ITAT RULES AND FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN (INDIA) LTD. (38 ITD 320) AND THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR (223 ITR 480) THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 4. IN THE RESULT THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNC ED ON THE 30 TH NOVEMBER 2017 AT CHENNAI. SD/ - SD/ - ( S. JAYARAMAN ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ( DUVVURU RL REDDY ) JUDICIAL MEMBER CHENNAI DATED THE 30 . 1 1 .201 7 VM/ - / COPY TO: 1. / APPELLANT 2. / RESPONDENT 3. ( ) / CIT(A) 4. / CIT 5. / DR & 6. / GF.