Shyamala Gunasekar, CHENNAI v. ITO, CHENNAI

ITA 1147/CHNY/2016 | 2009-2010
Pronouncement Date: 06-10-2016 | Result: Dismissed

Appeal Details

RSA Number 114721714 RSA 2016
Assessee PAN AORPS0748A
Bench Chennai
Appeal Number ITA 1147/CHNY/2016
Duration Of Justice 5 month(s) 8 day(s)
Appellant Shyamala Gunasekar, CHENNAI
Respondent ITO, CHENNAI
Appeal Type Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date 06-10-2016
Appeal Filed By Assessee
Order Result Dismissed
Bench Allotted C
Tribunal Order Date 06-10-2016
Date Of Final Hearing 06-10-2016
Next Hearing Date 06-10-2016
Assessment Year 2009-2010
Appeal Filed On 28-04-2016
Judgment Text
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL C BENCH CHENNAI . . . . ! ' BEFORE SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ ITA NO. 1147/MDS/2016 # $# /ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2009-10 SMT.SHYAMALA GUNASEKAR NO.3 GODOWN STREET FIRST FLOOR CHENNAI 600 001. PAN : AORPS 0748 A V. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER NON-CORPORATE WARD 12(4) ERSTWHILE BUSINESS WARD IX (4) KANNAMMAI BUILDING # 611 MOUNT ROAD CHENNAI 600 006. ( %& /APPELLANT) ( '(%& /RESPONDENT) %& ) * /APPELLANT BY : NONE '(%&)* /RESPONDENT BY : SHRI A.V.SREEKANTH JCIT + ) ! /DATE OF HEARING : 06.10.2016 -$ ) ! /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 06.10.2016 /O R D E R PER N.R.S. GANESAN JUDICIAL MEMBER: THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A) -13 CHENNAI DATED 19.11.2015 AND PERTAINS TO ASSES SMENT YEAR 2009-10. 2. THE NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SERVED ON THE ASSESSEE BY R.P.A.D. THE REGISTRY PLACED ON RECORD THE POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGEMEN T AS A PROOF OF SERVICE OF 2 I.T.A. NO.1147/MDS/2016 NOTICE. IN SPITE OF RECEIPT OF NOTICE BY R.P.A.D. THE ASSESSEE CHOOSES NOT TO APPEAR BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL EITHER IN PERSON OR THR OUGH AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. 3. THERE MAY BE VARIOUS REASONS FOR THE ASSESSEE FO R NOT APPEARING BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL ON 06.10.2016 WHEN THE APPEAL WAS TAKEN UP FOR HEARING. ONE OF THE REASONS PRESUMABLY THE ASSESSEE MAY NO T BE INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THIS APPEAL ANY FURTHER. WHATEVER MAY B E THE REASON BY KEEPING THE PROVISIONS TO RULE 24 OF THE INCOME TAX (APPELL ATE TRIBUNAL) RULES 1963 IN MIND THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED FOR N ON-PROSECUTION. HOWEVER IT IS MADE CLEAR THAT IT IS OPEN TO THE ASSESSEE TO MO VE THIS TRIBUNAL FOR RECALL OF THIS ORDER PROVIDED THERE IS SUFFICIENT CAUSE ON TH E PART OF THE ASSESSEE FOR NOT APPEARING BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL ON 06.10.2016 WHEN T HE APPEAL WAS TAKEN UP FOR HEARING. 4. WITH THE ABOVE OBSERVATION THE APPEAL OF THE AS SESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON 06 TH OCTOBER 2016 AT CHENNAI. SD/- SD/- ( . ) ( . . . ) (A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY) (N.R.S. GANESAN) ! /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER /JUDICIAL MEMBER /CHENNAI . /DATED THE 06 TH OCTOBER 2016. SP. 3 I.T.A. NO.1147/MDS/2016 ) ' /0 10$ /COPY TO: 1. %& /APPELLANT 2. '(%& /RESPONDENT 3. + 2 ( )/CIT(A) 4. + 2 /CIT 5. 03 ' /DR 6. 4# 5 /GF.