M/s Ravi Prakash Babu, Tirupathi v. ITO, Tirupathi

ITA 1213/HYD/2008 | 2005-2006
Pronouncement Date: 29-09-2011 | Result: Dismissed

Appeal Details

RSA Number 121322514 RSA 2008
Assessee PAN ADAPB2921N
Bench Hyderabad
Appeal Number ITA 1213/HYD/2008
Duration Of Justice 3 year(s) 2 month(s) 29 day(s)
Appellant M/s Ravi Prakash Babu, Tirupathi
Respondent ITO, Tirupathi
Appeal Type Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date 29-09-2011
Appeal Filed By Assessee
Order Result Dismissed
Bench Allotted B
Tribunal Order Date 29-09-2011
Date Of Final Hearing 14-03-2011
Next Hearing Date 14-03-2011
Assessment Year 2005-2006
Appeal Filed On 30-06-2008
Judgment Text
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD B BENCH HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI G.C. GUPTA VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NOS.1213/HYD/2008 ASSESSMENT YEAR 2005-06 SHRI M. RAVI PRAKASH BABU TIRUPATHI (PAN ADAPB 2921 N) VS ITO WARD 2(1) TIRUPATHI APPELLANT RESPONDENT APPELLANT BY : SHRI SHAIK JEELANI BASHA RESPONDENT BY : SHRI B.V. PRASAD REDDY DATE OF HEARING : 29.09.2011 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 29.09.2011 ORDER PER CHANDRA POOJARI A.M. THIS APPEAL PREFERRED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY THE CIT(A) TIRUPATHI DATED 30.4.2008 AND PERTAINS TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2005 -06. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING ON 29.09.2011 LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE PRAYED FOR ADJOURNMENT. INASMUCH THIS APPEAL COMING UP FOR HEARING ON AS MA NY AS THIRTEEN TIMES IN THE PAST HAS COME TO BE ADJOURNED AT THE REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEE ON SOME PRETEXT OR THE OTHE R WE WERE NOT INCLINED TO GRANT ADJOURNMENT THIS TIME A ND ACCORDINGLY REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT OF HEARING WAS REJECTED. SINCE THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESS EE EXPRESSED HIS INABILITY TO PROCEED WITH THE HEARING ON THE APPEAL IT APPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERE STED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. AS HELD BY THE ITAT DELH I BENCH IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA LIMITED (38 ITD 320) ITA NO.1213/H/2008 SHRI M. RAVI PRAKASH BABU TIRUPATHI 2 THERE MAY BE VARIOUS REASONS FOR THE ASSESSEE TO RE MAIN ABSENT AT THE TIME OF HEARING. ONE OF THE REASONS MIGHT BE A DESIGN OR ABSENCE OF NEED TO PROSECUTE THE APPEAL . BY FOLLOWING THE SAID DECISION AND CONSIDERING THE FAC TS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE PRESENT CASE WE DISMISS THE A PPEAL IN LIMINE. 3. IN THE RESULT THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESS EE STANDS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT 29.09.2011 SD/- SD/- G.C. G UPTA CHANDRA POOJARI VICE PRESIDENT ACCOUNTANT M EMBER DATED THE 29 TH SEPT 2011 COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. SHRI M. RAJGOPAL NAIDU C A 10/80 6 TH CROSS ROYAL NAGAR RC ROAD TIRUPATHI 2. THE ITO WARD 2(1) TIRUPATHI 3. THE CIT(A)-TIRUPATHI 4. THE ASSESSING OFFICER CONCERNED THROUGH THE CIT TIRUPATHI CHARGE TIRUPATHI. 5. THE CIT HYDERABAD 6. THE DR ITAT HYDERABAD NP/