Acit Exemption New Delhi v. Hamdard Dawakhana Wakf New Delhi

ITA 1247/DEL/2016 | 2010-2011
Pronouncement Date: 27-12-2017 | Result: Dismissed

Appeal Details

Note: Please login to view full details
RSA Number 124720114 RSA 2016
Assessee PAN xxxxxxxxxxx
Bench xxxxxxxxxxx
Appeal Number xxxxxxxxxxx
Duration Of Justice 1 year(s) 9 month(s) 21 day(s)
Appellant xxxxxxxxxxx
Respondent xxxxxxxxxxx
Appeal Type Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date 27-12-2017
Appeal Filed By Department
Tags No record found
Order Result Dismissed
Bench Allotted F
Tribunal Order Date 27-12-2017
Assessment Year 2010-2011
Appeal Filed On 07-03-2016
Judgment Text
In The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Delhi Bench F New Delhi Before Shri R K Panda Accountant Member And Ms Suchitra Kamble Judicial Member Ita No 1247 Del 2016 Assessment Year 2010 11 Acit Exemption Circle 1 1 New Delhi Vs Hamdard Dawakhana Wakf 2 A 3 Hamdard Building Asaf Ali Road New Delhi Pan Aaath 0842 H Appellant Respondent Department By Shri Atiq Ahmad Sr Dr Assessee By Shri R M Mehta Ca Date Of Hearing 27 12 2017 Date Of Pronouncement 27 12 2017 O R D E R Per R K Panda Am This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Agains T The Order Dated 18 12 2015 Of The Cit A 40 New Delhi Relating To Assessment Year 2010 11 2 The Only Effective Ground Raised By The Revenue Reads As Under 1 On The Facts And In The Circumstances Of The Ca Se And In Law The Ld Cit A Has Erred In Allowing Depreciation By Ignoring The Fact That Where The Capital Expenditure Has Been Treated To Have Been Applied F Or The Object Of The Trust Allowance Of Deduction On Account Of Depreciation W Ill Amount To Double Deduction In View Of The Recent Decision Of Honble Delhi High C Ourt In The Case Of Dit E Vs Charanjiv Charitable Trust Dated 18 03 2014 2 Ita No 1247 Del 2016 3 After Hearing Both The Sides We Find The Issue To Be Decided In The Grounds Of Appeal Is Regarding The Allowance Of Dep Reciation On Assets Purchased During The Earlier Years Which Have Been Claimed As Application Of Income In Earlier Years The Assessing Officer Did Not Allow Depreciation On Assets Purchased During The Earlier Years On The Gr Ound That Those Assets Have Been Claimed As Application Of Income In Earlier Ye Ars And Allowing Depreciation On The Same Will Amount To Double Benefit 4 In Appeal The Ld Cit A Relying On Various Dec Isions Held That The Assessee Is Entitled To Claim Depreciation On Asset S As Well As Application Of Income Of The Same It Is The Grievance Of The Rev Enue That The Order Of The Ld Cit A Is Not Correct In View Of The Decision Of Th E Honble Delhi High Court In The Case Of Dit E Vs Charanjiv Charitable Trust Order Dated 18 03 2014 We Find The Honble Supreme Court In The Case Of Cit V S Rajasthan Gujarati Charitable Foundation Poona Vide Order Dated 22 12 2017 Has Held That Even If The Entire Expenditure Incurred For Acquisition Of A Capital Asset Is Treated As Application Of Income For Charitable Purposes U S 1 1 1 A Of The Act The Assessee Is Also Entitled To Depreciation U S 32 T He Argument Of The Revenue That The Grant Of Depreciation Amounts To Giving Do Uble Benefit To The Assessee Is Not Acceptable Section 11 6 Which Bars Depreciat Ion On Expenditure Applied For Charitable Purposes Is Prospective And Applies Only From Assessment Year 2015 16 Since The Impugned Assessment Year Is 201 0 11 Therefore In View Of 3 Ita No 1247 Del 2016 The Decision Of The Honble Supreme Court Cited Su Pra We Find The No Infirmity In The Order Of The Ld Cit A Allowing D Epreciation On Assets Purchased During The Earlier Years Which Have Been Claimed As Application Of Income The Grounds Raised By The Revenue Are Acco Rdingly Dismissed 5 In The Result The Appeal Filed By The Revenue I S Dismissed Order Pronounced In The Open Court At The Time Hea Ring Itself I E On This 27 Th Day Of December 2017 Sd Sd Suchitra Kamble R K P Anda Judicial Member Accountant Member Dated 27 12 2017 Sujeet Copy Of Order To 1 The Appellant 2 The Respondent 3 The Cit 4 The Cit A 5 The Dr I T A T New Delhi By Order True Copy Assistant Registrar Itat New Delhi