Bharthi Bhaskar Shenoy Navi Mumbai v. Ito 28 1 2 Mumbai

In The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Mumbai Bench Smc Mumbai Before Shri D T Garasia Judicial Member Ita No 1309 M 2017 Assessment Year 2009 10 Mrs Bharathi Bhaskar Shenoy A 702 7 Th Floor Radhika Apartment Twin City Chs Sector 17 Vashi Navi Mumbai 400 703 Pan Bmcps 7452 P Vs Ito 28 1 2 Mumbai Appellant Respondent Present For Assessee By Shri Devendra Jain A R Revenue By Shri N Hemalatha D R Date Of Hearing 06 11 2017 Date Of Pronouncement 11 12 2017 O R D E R Per D T Garasia Judicial Member The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assess Ee Against The Order Dated 03 01 2017 Of The Commissioner Of I Ncome Tax Appeals Hereinafter Referred To As The Cit A R Elevant To Assessment Year 2009 10 2 During The Course Of Hearing The Ld A R Has F Iled The Application For Submitting The Additional Evidence In Respect Of Source Of The Deposit And Assessee Has Filed This E Vidence By Way Of Paper Book Before Me The Ld A R Submitted That This Admission Which Goes To The Route Of The Case Therefore It May Be Admitted And These Papers Were Not Admitted Before The Ao An D The Ld Cit A Therefore Assessee May Be Permitted To File The Same Ita No 1309 M 2017 Mrs Bharathi Bhaskar Shenoy 2 3 Having Heard Both The Parties I Am Of The View That This Is An Additional Evidence Which Goes To The Route Of The Case Viz Statement Of Term Deposit From The Bank Confirmation Letter From The Bank Bank Statement And Affidavit From Brother Of The As Sessee Therefore If This Documentary Evidence Is To Be Considered Th En Assessee Will Have A Better Case Therefore I Allow The Same 4 As I Have Admitted The Additional Evidence Which Goes To The Route Of The Case I Restore This Matter Back To Th E File Of Ao To Decide It Afresh After Considering This Additional Evidenc E Ao Is Directed To Consider The Same And Pass The Order As Per Law 5 In The Result Appeal Is Allowed For Statistical Purposes Order Pronounced In The Open Court On 11 12 2017 Sd D T Garasia Judicial Memb Er Mumbai Dated 11 12 2017 Kishore Sr P S Copy To The Appellant The Respondent The Cit Concerned Mumbai The Cit A Concerned Mumbai The Dr Concerned Bench True Copy By Ord Er Dy Asstt Registrar Itat Mumbai