RSA Number | 132123514 RSA 2015 |
---|---|
Assessee PAN | xxxxxxxxxxx |
Bench | xxxxxxxxxxx |
Appeal Number | xxxxxxxxxxx |
Duration Of Justice | 2 year(s) 1 month(s) 18 day(s) |
Appellant | xxxxxxxxxxx |
Respondent | xxxxxxxxxxx |
Appeal Type | Income Tax Appeal |
Pronouncement Date | 14-12-2017 |
Appeal Filed By | Assessee |
Tags | No record found |
Order Result | Dismissed |
Bench Allotted | B |
Tribunal Order Date | 14-12-2017 |
Last Hearing Date | 19-09-2017 |
First Hearing Date | 19-09-2017 |
Assessment Year | 2011-2012 |
Appeal Filed On | 27-10-2015 |
Judgment Text |
In The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Kolkata Bench D Kolkata Before Shri P M Jagtap Am Shri S S Viswanethra Ravi Jm I T A No 1321 Kol 2015 Assessment Year 2011 12 Millenium Road Construction Pvt Ltd Appellant C O S N Ghosh Associates Advocates Seben Brothers Lodge Buroshibtala Chinsurah Hooghly 712 105 Pan Aaecm 2990 E J C I T Range 2 Jalpaiguri Respondent Central Revenue Building Naya Busti Corporation Road Kotwali Jalpaiguri 735 101 Appearances By None Appearing On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Arindambhattacharjee Addl Cit Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing December 14 2017 Date Of Pronouncing The Order December 14 2017 Order This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld Cit Appeals Jalpaiguri Dated 07 08 2015 2 In This Case The Appeal Filed By The Assessee Was Initially Fixed For Hearing On 19 09 2017 The Assessee However Sought Adjournment On The Said Date And Accordingly The Hearing Was Adjourned To 31 10 2017 The Assessee Again Sought Adjournment On 31 10 2017 And Accordingly Hearing Was Adjourned To 14 12 2017 In Order To Give One More Opportunity To The Assessee On 14 12 2017 I E Today None However Has Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Nor Has Any Application Seeking Adjournment Has Been Filed It Appears 2 I T A No 1321 Kol 2015 Assessment Year 2011 12 Millenium Road Construction Pvt Ltd From This Conduct Of The Assessee That It Is Not Seriously Interested In Prosecuting This Appeal Filed Before The Tribunal 3 The Law Assists Those Who Are Vigilant And Not Those Who Sleep Over Their Rights This Principle Is Embodied In The Well Known Dictum Vigilantibus Non Dormientibus Jura Subvenient Considering The Facts And Keeping In Mind The Provisions Of Rule 19 2 Of The Itat Rules As Was Considered In The Case Of Cit Vs Multiplan India Pvt Ltd 38 Itd 320 Del And The Judgment Of The Honble Madhya Pradesh High Court In The Case Of Estate Of Late Tukojirao Halkar Vs C W T Reported In 223 Itr 480 We Treat This Appeal As Unadmitted And Dismiss The Same For Non Prosecution 4 In The Result The Appeal Of The Assessee Is Dismissed Order Pronounced In The Open Court On 14 Th December 2017 Sd Sd S S Viswanethra Ravi P M Jagtap Judicial Member Accountant Member Dated 14 12 2017 Biswajit Sr Ps Copy Of Order Forwarded To 1 Millenium Road Construction Pvt Ltd C O S N Ghosh Associates Advocates Seben Brothers Lodge Buroshibtala Chinsurah Hooghly 712105 2 Jcit Range 2 Jalpaiguri Kotwali Jalpaiguri 735101 3 The Cit A 3 I T A No 1321 Kol 2015 Assessment Year 2011 12 Millenium Road Construction Pvt Ltd 4 The Cit 5 Dr True Copy By Order Sr P S H O O Itat Kolkata
|