| RSA Number | 149120114 RSA 2009 |
|---|---|
| Bench | Delhi |
| Appeal Number | ITA 1491/DEL/2009 |
| Duration Of Justice | 9 month(s) 9 day(s) |
| Appellant | Market Committee, Haryana |
| Respondent | DCIT, Karnal |
| Appeal Type | Income Tax Appeal |
| Pronouncement Date | 25-01-2010 |
| Appeal Filed By | Assessee |
| Order Result | Dismissed |
| Bench Allotted | E |
| Tribunal Order Date | 25-01-2010 |
| Date Of Final Hearing | 25-01-2010 |
| Next Hearing Date | 25-01-2010 |
| Assessment Year | 2006-2007 |
| Appeal Filed On | 15-04-2009 |
| Judgment Text |
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH E : NEW DELHI BEFORE MS.SUSHMA CHOWLA JM AND SHRI K.D.RANJAN AM ITA NO.1491/DEL/2009 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2006-07 M/S MARKET COMMITTEE INDRI NEW GRAIN MARKET KARNAL DISTRICT KARNAL HARYANA. PAN NO.AAALM0085D. VS. DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX KARNAL. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDEN T) APPELLANT BY : NONE. RESPONDENT BY : SMT.ABHA RANI SINGH SR.DR. ORDER PER SUSHMA CHOWLA JM : THIS APPEAL IS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE O RDER OF CIT(A) DATED 23.1.2009. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING BEFORE US NOBODY HAS PUT IN APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY APPLICATION REQUESTING FOR ADJ OURNMENT OR OTHERWISE HAS BEEN RECEIVED. THE NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SENT TO THE AS SESSEE WELL IN ADVANCE AND HAS NOT RETURNED UNSERVED FROM THE POSTAL AUTHORITIES A ND IS DEEMED TO HAVE BEEN SERVED. ON AN EARLIER OCCASION ALSO I.E. ON 14.12. 2009 WHEN THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE WAS FIXED FOR HEARING NOBODY PUT IN APPEA RANCE ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE AND THE MATTER WAS ADJOURNED. THIS CONDUCT OF THE ASSESSEE SHOWS THAT IT IS NOT SERIOUSLY INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THIS APPEAL FIL ED BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL. 3. CONSIDERING THE FACTS NARRATED ABOVE AND KEEPING IN MIND THE PROVISIONS OF RULE 19(2) OF THE ITAT RULES AS WERE CONSIDERED BY THE TRIBUNAL IN CIT VS. MULTIPLAN (INDIA) PVT.LTD. 38 ITD 320 (DEL) AND M .P.HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ITA-1491/DEL/2009 2 LATE TUKOJI RAO HOLKAR 223 ITR 480 (MP) THIS APP EAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS TREATED AS UNADMITTED AND DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION. T HE ASSESSEE IF SO ADVISED SHALL BE FREE TO MOVE THE TRIBUNAL EXPLAINING THE R EASONS FOR NON-COMPLIANCE AND FOR RECALLING OF THIS ORDER AND IF THE BENCH IS SO SATISFIED THEN THIS ORDER MAY BE RECALLED. 4. IN THE RESULT THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. DECISION PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON CONCLUSION OF HEARING ON 25 TH JANUARY 2010. SD/- SD/- (K.D.RANJAN) (SUSHMA CHOWLA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED : 25.01.2010. VK. COPY FORWARDED TO: - 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR ITAT DEPUTY REGISTRAR
|