Arunabha Dhar, Kolkata v. ITO, Ward - 27(4), Kolkata, Kolkata

ITA 1668/KOL/2010 | 2006-2007
Pronouncement Date: 21-03-2011 | Result: Dismissed

Appeal Details

RSA Number 166823514 RSA 2010
Assessee PAN ADEPD5207F
Bench Kolkata
Appeal Number ITA 1668/KOL/2010
Duration Of Justice 6 month(s) 28 day(s)
Appellant Arunabha Dhar, Kolkata
Respondent ITO, Ward - 27(4), Kolkata, Kolkata
Appeal Type Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date 21-03-2011
Appeal Filed By Assessee
Order Result Dismissed
Bench Allotted C
Tribunal Order Date 21-03-2011
Assessment Year 2006-2007
Appeal Filed On 24-08-2010
Judgment Text
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL C BENCH : KOLKATA [ () . .. . ! ! ! !. .. . '# ] ]] ] [BEFORE HONBLE SRI MAHAVIR SINGH JM & HONBLE S RI C. D. RAO AM] % / I.T.A NO. 1668/KOL/2010 &' ()/ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2006-07 ARUNABHA DHAR -VS.- INCOME TAX OFFICER/WARD- 27(4) KOLKATA [PAN : ADEPD 5207 F] KOLKATA. [ + /APPELLANT ] [ -.+ / RESPONDENT ] + / FOR THE APPELLANT : NONE -.+ / FOR THE RESPONDENT : SHRI B.R. PURAKAYASTH A SR. D.R. '/ /ORDER . .. . ! ! ! !. .. . '# PER C. D. RAO A. M. THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED THIS APPEAL FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07 AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD. CIT(A)-XIV KOLKATA DATED 18.03.2010. 2. THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS TIME BARRED BY 7 DAYS. THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED APPLICATION DATED 23.08.2010 PRAYING TO CONDONE DEL AY. THE LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE HAS NOT OBJECTED TO THE PRAYER OF THE ASSESSEE. AFT ER HEARING BOTH THE PARTIES AND CONSIDERING THE CONTENTS OF THE APPLICATION WE ARE OF THE CONS IDERED VIEW THAT THERE IS A REASONABLE CAUSE FOR DELAY IN FILING APPEAL. HENCE WE CONDONE THE D ELAY AND CONSIDER THE APPEAL. 3. THIS APPEAL CAME FOR HEARING ON 14.10.2010 FOR T HE FIRST TIME AND ADJOURNED AT THE REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEE AND SUBSEQUENTLY ON 28.12.2 010 AND FINALLY FOR 21.03.2011. THE NOTICE WAS RECEIVED BY THE ASSESSEE BUT DID NOT ATTEND THE HEARING DESPITE SERVICE OF NOTICE. NO ITA NO. 1668/KOL/20 10 2 ADJOURNMENT PETITION WAS MOVED. IT MEANS THAT ASSES SEE IS NOT INTERESTED TO PROSECUTE THE APPEAL. 3. CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND KEEPING IN MIND THE DE CISION IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA PVT. LTD. 38 ITD 320 WE DISMISS THE APPEAL AS ASSESSEE NOT INTERESTED. 4. HOWEVER THE ASSESSEE SHALL BE AT LIBERTY TO APP ROACH THE TRIBUNAL FOR RECALLING THIS ORDER IF PREVENTED BY SUFFICIENT CAUSE FOR NON-APP EARANCE ON THE DATE OF HEARING. 5. IN THE RESULT THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION. '/ #0' 1 0& 2 3 !# ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON 21. 03. 2011. SD/- SD/- [ ] [ . .. . ! ! ! !. .. . '# ] [ MAHAVIR SINGH ] [ C. D. RAO ] JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (!#) DATED : 21. 03. 2011. [KKC 45 &67 8 /SR.PS] '/ 9 -: ;':(/ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. + /APPELLANT- ARUNABHA DHAR A 4/1/2 CALCUTTA GREE NS 1050/2 SURVEY PARK KOLKATA-700 075. 2 -.+ / RESPONDENT : INCOME TAX OFFICER/WARD-27(4) BAMBO OVILLA 169 A.J.C. BOSE ROAD KOLKATA-700 014. 3. /&/ THE CIT 4. /& ()/ THE CIT(A) KOLKATA. 5. A2 -&/ DR KOLKATA BENCHES KOLKATA [.: -/ TRUE COPY ] '/&0/ BY ORDER 7 /ASSTT REGISTRAR