M/s Rotex Enterprises Private Limited,, Vadodara v. ITO, Ward--2(1)(2),, Vadodara

ITA 193/AHD/2018 | 2014-2015
Pronouncement Date: 29-11-2019 | Result: Dismissed

Our System has flagged this appeal as eligible for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. If you are party to this appeal, get on a Free Consultation Call with our team of Legal Experts who shall guide you as to how you can save huge Interest and Penalty in VSV Scheme.


Apply Now
        
Try VSV Calculator

Appeal Details

RSA Number 19320514 RSA 2018
Assessee PAN AADCR4420K
Bench Ahmedabad
Appeal Number ITA 193/AHD/2018
Duration Of Justice 1 year(s) 10 month(s) 7 day(s)
Appellant M/s Rotex Enterprises Private Limited,, Vadodara
Respondent ITO, Ward--2(1)(2),, Vadodara
Appeal Type Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date 29-11-2019
Appeal Filed By Assessee
Tags 193
Order Result Dismissed
Bench Allotted SMC
Tribunal Order Date 29-11-2019
Date Of Final Hearing 26-09-2019
Next Hearing Date 26-09-2019
Last Hearing Date 16-07-2019
First Hearing Date 16-07-2019
Assessment Year 2014-2015
Appeal Filed On 22-01-2018
Judgment Text
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SMC BENCH AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI WASEEM AHMED ACCOUNTANT MEMBER& MS. MADHUMITA ROY JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. NO. 193/AHD/2018 (ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2014-15) ROTEX ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. 1 ST FLOOR 5 RADHEY COMPLEX 52/A RADHA-KRISHNA PARK AKOTA VADODARA- 390020 VS. ITO WARD-2(1)(2) VADODARA [PAN NO. AAD CR4 420 K] ( APPELLANT ) .. ( RESPONDENT ) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SHRI N. K. GOEL SR. D.R. DATE OF HEARING 26.09.2019 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 29.11.2019 O R D E R PER MS. MADHUMITA ROY - JM: THE INSTANT APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTE D AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 28.11.2017 PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCO ME TAX (APPEALS) 2 VADODARA UNDER SECTION 143(3) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961 (HEREINAFTER REFERRED AS TO THE ACT) ARISING OUT OF THE ORDER DATED 08.12.2016 PASSED BY THE DCIT CRICLE-2(1)(2) BARODA FOR ASSESSMENT YEA R 2014-15. 2. AT THE TIME OF THE HEARING OF THE INSTANT APPEAL NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NEITHER ANY ADJOURNMENT WAS SOUGHT FOR HENCE IT APPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED TO PROC EED WITH THE MATTER. IN THIS ASPECT RELYING ON THE JUDGMENT PASSED BY THE HONB LE DELHI HIGH COURT IN ITA NO.193/AHD/2018 ROTEX ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. VS. ITO ASST.YEAR 2014-15 - 2 - THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD. 38 ITD 320. WE A RE INCLINED TO DISMISS THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR NON-PROSECUTIO N. THIS APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 3. IN THE RESULT THE ASSESSEES APPEAL IS DISMISSE D. THIS ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 29/11/2019 SD/- SD/- (WASEEM AHMED) (MS. MADHUMITA ROY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED 29/11/2019 TANMAY SR. PS TRUE COPY / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT. 3. / CONCERNED CIT 4. ( ) / THE CIT(A)- 5. ! ' #$%% / DR ITAT AHMEDABAD 6. &' () / GUARD FILE. / BY ORDER / (DY./ASSTT. REGISTRAR) ! #$ / ITAT AHMEDABAD 1. DATE OF DICTATION 22.11.2019 2. DATE ON WHICH THE TYPED DRAFT IS PLACED BEFORE THE DICTATING MEMBER 26.11.2019 3. OTHER MEMBER 4. DATE ON WHICH THE APPROVED DRAFT COMES TO THE SR.P. S./P.S 27 .11.2019 5. DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER IS PLACED BEFORE THE D ICTATING MEMBER FOR PRONOUNCEMENT .11.2019 6. DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER COMES BACK TO THE SR.P .S./P.S .11.2019 7. DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE BENCH CLERK 29.11.2019 8. DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE HEAD CLERK ... 9. THE DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE ASSISTANT RE GISTRAR FOR SIGNATURE ON THE ORDER.. 10. DATE OF DESPATCH OF THE ORDER