Appeal Details
| RSA Number | 27020514 RSA 2009 |
|---|---|
| Assessee PAN | AOWPP9363F |
| Bench | Ahmedabad |
| Appeal Number | ITA 270/AHD/2009 |
| Duration Of Justice | 2 year(s) 9 month(s) 4 day(s) |
| Appellant | Shri Rajesh I.Patel, Dist.Navsari |
| Respondent | The Income tax Officer,Ward-1,, Navsari |
| Appeal Type | Income Tax Appeal |
| Pronouncement Date | 01-11-2011 |
| Appeal Filed By | Assessee |
| Order Result | Dismissed |
| Bench Allotted | A |
| Tribunal Order Date | 01-11-2011 |
| Date Of Final Hearing | 01-11-2011 |
| Next Hearing Date | 01-11-2011 |
| Assessment Year | 2001-2002 |
| Appeal Filed On | 28-01-2009 |
| Judgment Text |
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT AHMEDABAD A BENCH .. !'# !'# !'# !'# $ .%.&'( %) * % # % # % # % # BEFORE S/SHRI G.C. GUPTA VICE-PRESIDENT AND A.K. GARODIA ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) ITA NO.270 AND 271/AHD/2009 [ASSTT.YEAR : 2001-02 AND 2002-2003] RAJESH PATEL PROP. OF FOREVER STONE AT BORIACH POST. ASTGAM TAL. BILIMORA DIST. NAVSARI PAN : AOWPP 9363 F /VS. ITO WARD-1 NAVSARI. ( (( ( - - - - / APPELLANT) ( (( (./ - ./ - ./ - ./ - / RESPONDENT) 01 2 3 %/ ASSESSEE BY : NONE * 2 3 %/ REVENUE BY : SHRI RAKESH AGRAWAL 5 2 16)/ DATE OF HEARING : 1 ST NOVEMBER 2011 7&8 2 16)/ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 1 ST NOVEMBER 2011 %9 / O R D E R PER G.C. GUPTA VICE-PRESIDENT: THESE ARE TWO ASSESSEES APPEALS FOR THE ASSTT.YEAR 2001-02 AND 2002-2003 AG AINST THE ORDERS OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS) VALSAD DA TED 14.10.2008 RAISING VARIOUS GROUNDS AS SET OUT IN THE GROUNDS O F APPEAL. THE ASSESSEE HAS ALSO FILED ADDITIONAL GROUNDS VIDE LETTER DATED 24-2-2011 IN BOTH THE APPEALS WITH A REQUEST TO ADMIT THE SAME. 2. THE NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SERVED ON THE ASSESSEE BY RPAD AT THE ADDRESS GIVEN IN FORM NO.36. HOWEVER AT THE TIME OF HEARING OF THE CASE NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. ON EARLIER OCCASIONS I.E. 28-2-2011 AND 13-6-2011 ALSO THE CASE WAS GETTING A DJOURNED AT THE REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEE. IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES I T IS INFERRED THAT THE ITA NO.270 AND 271/AHD/2009 -2- ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSING ITS APPEAL. THEREFORE FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF DELHI BENCH IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN (I NDIA) LTD. 38 ITD 320 WE DISMISS THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 3. IN THE RESULT THE ASSESSEES APPEALS ARE DISMIS SED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON THE DATE MENTIONE D HEREINABOVE. SD/- SD/- ( .%.&'( /A.K. GARODIA) %) * /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ( . .. . . .. . /G.C. GUPTA) !'# !'# !'# !'# /VICE-PRESIDENT C OPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1) : APPELLANT 2) : RESPONDENT 3) : CIT(A) 4) : CIT CONCERNED 5) : DR ITAT. BY ORDER DR/AR ITAT AHMEDABAD
|