Nalinkumar Ramniklal Shah Ahmedabad v. Income Tax Officer Ward 3 Surendranagar

ITA 3128/AHD/2014 | 2006-2007
Pronouncement Date: 13-12-2017 | Result: Dismissed

Appeal Details

Note: Please login to view full details
RSA Number 312820514 RSA 2014
Assessee PAN xxxxxxxxxxx
Bench xxxxxxxxxxx
Appeal Number xxxxxxxxxxx
Duration Of Justice 3 year(s) 18 day(s)
Appellant xxxxxxxxxxx
Respondent xxxxxxxxxxx
Appeal Type Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date 13-12-2017
Appeal Filed By Assessee
Tags No record found
Order Result Dismissed
Bench Allotted A
Tribunal Order Date 13-12-2017
Assessment Year 2006-2007
Appeal Filed On 25-11-2014
Judgment Text
In The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal A Bench Ahmedabad Izeksn Dqekj Izeksn Dqekj Izeksn Dqekj Izeksn Dqekj Before Shri Pramod Kumar Accountant Member And Shri Mahavir Prasad Judicial Member I T A No 3128 Ahd 2014 Assessment Year 2006 07 Nalinkumar Ramniklal Shah B 501 Kalatirth Apartment Nr Prernatirth Jain Temple Jodhpur Satellite Ahmedabad 380 015 Vs Ito Ward 3 Irish Hospital Building Opp Mela Medan Surendranagar 363 001 Pan Gir No Aeqps 9741 G Appellant Respondent Appellant By None Respondent By Shri Aoiupama Singla Sr D R Date Of Hearing 08 12 2017 Date Of Pronouncement 13 12 2017 O R D E R Per Mahavir Prasad Judicial Member This Is An Appeal By The Assessee Against The Or Der Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Appeals Xvi Ahmedabad Dated 12 09 2014 For The Assessment Year Ay 2006 07 Ita No 3128 Ahd 2014 Nalinkumar Ramniklal Shah Vs Ito Asst Year 2006 07 2 2 The Notice Of Hearing Was Sent To The Assessee B Y Registered Post As Per The Address Given In Column No 10 Of Form No 36 However At The Time Of Hearing None Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Nor Any Application For Adjournment Has Been Filed From T His It Is Reasonable To Infer That The Assessee Is Not Serious To Pursue It S Case Honble Supreme Court In The Case Of Cit Vs B N Bhattachargee And Another 118 Itr 461 Sc Observed That Preferring An Appeal Means Ef Fectively Pursuing It Honble M P High Court In The Case Of Estate Of La Te Tukojirao Holkar Vs Cwt 223 Itr 480 M P Dismissed The Reference Filed By The Assessee For Not Taking Necessary Steps Similar V Iew Is Taken By I T A T Delhi Bench In The Case Of Multiplan Indi A Ltd 38 Itd 320 Considering The Above It Appears That The Assessee Is Not Interested In Prosecuting Its Appeal We Therefore Dismiss The Appeal Filed By The Assessee For Non Prosecution 3 In The Result Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is D Ismissed This Order Pronounced In Open Court On 13 12 2017 Sd Sd Izeksn Dqekj Izeksn Dqekj Izeksn Dqekj Izeksn Dqekj Egkohj Izlkn Egkohj Izlkn Egkohj Izlkn Egkohj Izlkn Yks Kk Ln Yks Kk Ln Yks Kk Ln Yks Kk Lnl L L L U Kf D Lnl U Kf D Lnl U Kf D Lnl U Kf D Lnl Pramod Kumar Mahavir Prasad Accountant Member Judicial Member Ahmedabad Dated 13 12 2017 Priti Yadav Sr Ps Ita No 3128 Ahd 2014 Nalinkumar Ramniklal Shah Vs Ito Asst Year 2006 07 3 Copy Of The Order Forwarded To 1 The Appellant 2 The Respondent 3 012 3 Concerned Cit 4 3 45 The Cit A Xvi Ahmedabad 5 67 8 12 12 0 Dr Itat Ahmedabad 6 8 9 Guard File By Order 6 True Copy Dy Asstt Registrar Itat Ahmedabad 1 Date Of Dictation 13 12 2017 Covered Case 2 Date On Which The Typed Draft Is Placed Before The Dictating Member 13 12 2017 3 Other Member 4 Date On Which The Approved Draft Comes To The Sr P S P S 5 Date On Which The Fair Order Is Placed Before The D Ictating Member For Pronouncement 6 Date On Which The Fair Order Comes Back To The Sr P S P S 7 Date On Which The File Goes To The Bench Clerk 8 Date On Which The File Goes To The Head Clerk 9 The Date On Which The File Goes To The Assistant Re Gistrar For Signature On The Order 10 Date Of Despatch Of The Order