Appeal Details
| RSA Number | 31520314 RSA 2013 |
|---|---|
| Assessee PAN | AGGPG9697R |
| Bench | Agra |
| Appeal Number | ITA 315/AGR/2013 |
| Duration Of Justice | 2 month(s) 4 day(s) |
| Appellant | Sh. Subhash Chand Gautam, Aligarh |
| Respondent | I.T.O. Ward-1, Aligarh |
| Appeal Type | Income Tax Appeal |
| Pronouncement Date | 31-10-2013 |
| Appeal Filed By | Assessee |
| Order Result | Dismissed |
| Bench Allotted | DB |
| Tribunal Order Date | 31-10-2013 |
| Date Of Final Hearing | 30-07-2014 |
| Next Hearing Date | 30-07-2014 |
| Assessment Year | 2005-2006 |
| Appeal Filed On | 26-08-2013 |
| Judgment Text |
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AGRA BENCH AGRA BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 315/AGRA/ 2013 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2005-06 SHRI SUBHASH CHAND GAUTAM VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1 C/O. SHRI DEEPAK SINGH ADVOCATE ALIGARH. 2 COURT OF WARDS COMPOUND ALIGARH. (PAN AGGPG 9697 R) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SHRI K.K. MISHRA JR. D.R. DATE OF HEARING : 28.10.2013 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 31.10.2013 ORDER PER PRAMOD KUMAR ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 16.05.2013 PASSED BY THE LEARNED CIT(A) MUZAFFARNAGAR FOR A.Y . 2005-06. 2. THE NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SENT TO THE ASSESSEE B Y REGISTERED POST AS PER THE ADDRESS GIVEN IN COLUMN NO.10 OF FORM NO.36. HOWEV ER AT THE TIME OF HEARING NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY APP LICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT HAS BEEN FILED. FROM THIS IT IS REASONABLE TO INFER T HAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT SERIOUS TO PURSUE ITS CASE. HONBLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. B.N. BHATTACHARGEE AND ANOTHER 118 ITR 461(SC) OBSERVED THAT PREFERRI NG AN APPEAL MEANS ITA NO.315 /AGRA/2013 A.Y. 2005-06 2 EFFECTIVELY PURSUING IT. HONBLE M.P. HIGH COURT I N THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT 223 ITR 480(M.P.) DISMISS ED THE REFERENCE FILED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR NOT TAKING NECESSARY STEPS. SIMIL AR VIEW IS TAKEN BY I.T.A.T. DELHI BENCH IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD. 38 ITD 320. CONSIDERING THE ABOVE IT APPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTEREST ED IN PROSECUTING ITS APPEAL. WE THEREFORE DISMISS THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR NON-PROSECUTION. 3. IN THE RESULT THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESS EE IS DISMISSED IN LIMINE. (ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT) SD/- SD/- (BHAVNESH SAINI) (PRAMOD KUMAR) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER PBN/* COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO:- 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT (APPEALS) CONCERNED 4. CIT CONCERNED 5. D.R. ITAT AGRA BENCH AGRA 6. GUARD FILE. BY ORDER SR. PRIVATE SECRETARY INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AGRA TRUE COPY
|