Appeal Details
| RSA Number | 32119914 RSA 2009 |
|---|---|
| Assessee PAN | AAACG8338G |
| Bench | Mumbai |
| Appeal Number | ITA 321/MUM/2009 |
| Duration Of Justice | 1 year(s) 2 month(s) 27 day(s) |
| Appellant | GLEG ENGINEERS P. LTD, MUMBAI |
| Respondent | ITO 9-1(4), Mumbai |
| Appeal Type | Income Tax Appeal |
| Pronouncement Date | 12-04-2010 |
| Appeal Filed By | Assessee |
| Order Result | Dismissed |
| Bench Allotted | G |
| Tribunal Order Date | 12-04-2010 |
| Date Of Final Hearing | 13-07-2010 |
| Next Hearing Date | 13-07-2010 |
| Assessment Year | 2005-2006 |
| Appeal Filed On | 15-01-2009 |
| Judgment Text |
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL G BENCH: MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI R S SYAL ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NOS 320 AND 321/MUM/2009 (ASSESSMENT YEARS: 2004-05 AND 2005-06) M/S GLEG ENGINEERS PVT LTD 302-303 DHEERAJ PLAZA HILL ROAD BANDRA (WEST) MUMBAI -400 050 PAN: AAACG 8338 G VS ITO -9-1(4) AAYAKAR BHAVAN MUMBAI APPELLANT RESPONDENT APPELLANT BY: NONE RESPONDENT BY: MR MOHD USMAN ORDER PER R S SYAL ACCOUNTANT MEMBER THESE APPEALS BY THE ASSESSEE ARE DIRECTED AGAINST THE DIFFERENT ORDERS OF LEARNED CIT- IX MUMBAI COMMONLY DATED 31.10.2008 FO R ASSESSMENT YEAR 2004-05 AND 2005-06 RESPECTIVELY. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING FIXED IN THESE CASES ON 1 2.04.2010 NOBODY HAS PUT IN APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY APPLIC ATION SEEKING ADJOURNMENT OF THE SAID HEARING IS FILED DESPITE THE FACT THAT NOTICE OF THE SAID HEARING SENT TO THE ASSESSEE BY RPAD HAS BEEN DULY SERVED UPON THE ASSE SSEE. IT APPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE THUS IS NOT SERIOUSLY INTERESTED IN PROSEC UTING THESE APPEALS FILED BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL. 3. CONSIDERING THE FACTS NARRATED ABOVE AND KEEPING IN MIND THE PROVISIONS OF RULE 19(2) OF THE ITAT RULES AS WERE CONSIDERED BY THE TRIBUNAL IN CIT VS MULTIPLAN (INDIA) PVT LTD (38 ITD 320)(DEL) AND BY HONBLE MA DHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT (223 ITR 480)(MP) THESE AP PEALS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE TREATED AS UNADMITTED AND DISMISSED FOR NON-PRO SECUTION. THE ASSESSEE IF SO ADVISED SHALL BE FREE TO MOVE THE TRIBUNAL EXPLAIN ING THE REASONS FOR NON-COMPLIANCES ITA NOS 320 AND 321/M/2009 M/S GLEG ENGINEERS PVT LTD 2 AND FOR RECALLING THIS ORDER AND IF THE BENCH IS SO SATISFIED THEN THIS ORDER MAY BE RECALLED. 4. IN THE RESULT BOTH THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE DISMISSED. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT TODAY ON THE 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2010. SD/- (VIJAY PAL RAO) JUDICIAL MEMBER SD/- (R S SYAL) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI DATE: 12TH APRIL 2010 COPY TO:- 1) THE APPELLANT. 2) THE RESPONDENT. 3) THE CIT (A) -IX MUMBAI. 4) THE CIT-IX MUMBAI. 5) THE D.R. G BENCH ITAT MUMBAI. BY ORDER / / TRUE COPY / / ASSTT. REGISTRAR CHAVAN* I.T.A.T. MUMBAI ITA NOS 320 AND 321/M/2009 M/S GLEG ENGINEERS PVT LTD 3 SR.N. EPISODE OF AN ORDER DATE INITIALS CONCERNED 1 DRAFT DICTATED ON 12.04.2010 SR.PS 2 DRAFT PLACED BEFORE AUTHOR 12.04.2010 SR.PS 3 DRAFT PROPOSED & PLACED BEFORE THE SECOND MEMBER JM/AM 4 DRAFT DISCUSSED/APPROVED BY SECOND MEMBER JM/AM 5 APPROVED DRAFT COMES TO THE SR.PS SR.PS 6 KEPT FOR PRONOUNCEMENT ON SR.PS 7 FILE SENT TO THE BENCH CLERK SR.PS 8 DATE ON WHICH FILE GOES TO THE HEAD CLERK 9 DATE OF DISPATCH OF ORDER
|