BHOJ RAJ MAKHIJA, Kota v. ACIT, Jaipur

ITA 347/JPR/2016 | 2011-2012
Pronouncement Date: 29-11-2017 | Result: Dismissed

Appeal Details

RSA Number 34723114 RSA 2016
Assessee PAN ABGPM1361B
Bench Jaipur
Appeal Number ITA 347/JPR/2016
Duration Of Justice 1 year(s) 7 month(s) 22 day(s)
Appellant BHOJ RAJ MAKHIJA, Kota
Respondent ACIT, Jaipur
Appeal Type Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date 29-11-2017
Appeal Filed By Assessee
Tags No record found
Order Result Dismissed
Bench Allotted SMC
Tribunal Order Date 29-11-2017
Date Of Final Hearing 22-06-2017
Next Hearing Date 22-06-2017
First Hearing Date 22-06-2017
Assessment Year 2011-2012
Appeal Filed On 07-04-2016
Judgment Text
VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL JAIPUR BENCHES JAIPUR JH HKKXPAN] YS[KK LNL; OA JH DQY HKKJR ] U;KF;D LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI BHAGCHAND AM & SHRI KUL BHARAT JM VK;DJ VIHY LA-@ ITA NO. 347 & 348/JP/2016 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z@ ASSESSMENT YEARS : 2011-12 & 2012-13 BHOJ RAJ MAKHIJA PROP.- M/S RAJESH KUMAR & COMPANY OLD DHAN MANDI KOTA. CUKE VS. A.C.I.T. CIRCLE-3 JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO.: ABGPM 1361 B VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS@ ASSESSEE BY : NONE JKTLO DH VKSJ LS@ REVENUE BY : SHRI R.A. VERMA (ADDL.CIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 29/11/2017 MN?KKS'K.KK DH RKJH[K @ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 29/11/2017 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: KUL BHARAT J.M. BOTH THESE APPEAL FILED BY THE SAME ASSESSEE EMANA TES FROM THE SEPARATE ORDERS OF THE LD. CIT(A)-4 JAIPUR DATED 21 /01/2016 FOR THE A.Y. 2011-12 AND 2012-13. IN ITA NO. 347/JP/2016 THE AS SESSEE HAS TAKEN SOLE GROUND OF APPEAL WHICH IS AGAINST CONFIRMING T HE PENALTY OF RS. 9 27 000/- U/S 271(1)(C) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961 (IN SHORT THE ACT) AND IN ITA NO. 348/JP/2016 THE ASSESSEE HAS ALSO TA KEN SOLE GROUND WHICH IS AGAINST CONFIRMING THE PENALTY OF RS. 28 16 930/- MADE U/S 271AAA OF THE ACT. ITA 347 & 348/JP/2016_ BHOJ RAJ MAKHIJA VS ACIT 2 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING NO ONE HAS APPEARED ON B EHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. FROM THIS IT APPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE I S NOT INTERESTED TO PURSUE HIS CASE. SO IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF DELHI BENCH OF ITAT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD. AND ALSO ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT 223 ITR 480 (MP) TH E APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE NOT ADMITTED AND ARE DISMISSED AS LIMI NE AS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 29/11/2017. 3. IN THE RESULT THE BOTH THE APPEALS OF THE ASSES SEE ARE DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 29/11/2017. SD/- SD/- HKKXPAN DQY HKKJR (BHAGCHAND) (KUL BHARAT) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 29 TH NOVEMBER 2017 *RANJAN VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR @ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ @ THE APPELLANT- SHRI BHOJ RAJ MAKHIJA KOTA. 2. IZR;FKHZ @ THE RESPONDENT- THE A.C.I.T. CIRCLE-3 JAIPUR. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR @ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDRVIHY @ THE CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ @ DR ITAT JAIPUR 6. XKMZ QKBZY @ GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 347 & 348/JP/2016) VKNS'KKUQLKJ @ BY ORDER LGK;D IATHDKJ @ ASST. REGISTRAR