Appeal Details
| RSA Number | 3520514 RSA 2015 |
|---|---|
| Assessee PAN | xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Bench | xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Appeal Number | xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Duration Of Justice | 2 year(s) 11 month(s) 7 day(s) |
| Appellant | xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Respondent | xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Appeal Type | Income Tax Appeal |
| Pronouncement Date | 13-12-2017 |
| Appeal Filed By | Assessee |
| Tags | 35 |
| Order Result | Dismissed |
| Bench Allotted | B |
| Tribunal Order Date | 13-12-2017 |
| Assessment Year | 2010-2011 |
| Appeal Filed On | 05-01-2015 |
| Judgment Text |
C Cc C Kh Khkh Kh In The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal B Bench Ahmedabad Before Shri N K Billaiya Accountant Member And Shri Mahavir Prasad Judicial Member I T A No 35 Ahd 2015 Assessment Year 2010 11 Shri Aniruddhsinh Valkubha Kathi 313 3 Rd Floor Surabhi Mall Waghawadi Road Bhavnagar 364 002 Vs Ito Ward 1 2 Bhavnagar Pan Gir No Agwpk 8476 G Appellant Respondent Appellant By None Respondent By Shri Sumit Kumar Verma Sr Dr Date Of Hearing 30 11 2017 012 Date Of Pronouncement 13 12 2017 3 O R D E R Per Mahavir Prasad Judicial Member This Is An Appeal By The Assessee Against The Or Der Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Appeals Xx Ahmedabad Dated 01 10 2014 For The Assessment Year Ay 2010 11 2 The Notice Of Hearing Was Sent To The Assessee B Y Registered Post As Per The Address Given In Column No 10 Of Form No 36 However At Ita No 35 Ahd 2015 Shri Aniruddhsinh Valkubha Kathi Vs Ito Asst Year 2010 11 2 The Time Of Hearing None Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Nor Any Application For Adjournment Has Been Filed From T His It Is Reasonable To Infer That The Assessee Is Not Serious To Pursue It S Case Honble Supreme Court In The Case Of Cit Vs B N Bhattachargee And Another 118 Itr 461 Sc Observed That Preferring An Appeal Means Ef Fectively Pursuing It Honble M P High Court In The Case Of Estate Of La Te Tukojirao Holkar Vs Cwt 223 Itr 480 M P Dismissed The Reference Filed By The Assessee For Not Taking Necessary Steps Similar V Iew Is Taken By I T A T Delhi Bench In The Case Of Multiplan Indi A Ltd 38 Itd 320 Considering The Above It Appears That The Assessee Is Not Interested In Prosecuting Its Appeal We Therefore Dismiss The Appeal Filed By The Assessee For Non Prosecution 3 In The Result Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is D Ismissed This Order Pronounced In Open Cour T On 13 1 2 201 7 Sd Sd 4 5 N K Billaiya Mahavir Prasad Accountant Member Judicial Member Ahmedabad Dated 13 12 2017 Priti Yadav Sr Ps Ita No 35 Ahd 2015 Shri Aniruddhsinh Valkubha Kathi Vs Ito Asst Year 2010 11 3 Copy Of The Order Forwarded To 1 The Appellant 2 The Respondent 3 67 8 Concerned Cit 4 8 4 5 The Cit A Xx Ahmedabad 5 9 67 672 Dr Itat Ahmedabad 6 Guard File By Order 9 True Copy Dy Asstt Registrar Itat Ahmedabad
|