Sh. Krishna Gopal Goswami, Mathura v. I.T.O., Ward-3(2), Mathura

ITA 356/AGR/2011 | 2007-2008
Pronouncement Date: 31-07-2012 | Result: Dismissed

Appeal Details

RSA Number 35620314 RSA 2011
Assessee PAN AEFPG0729M
Bench Agra
Appeal Number ITA 356/AGR/2011
Duration Of Justice 10 month(s) 15 day(s)
Appellant Sh. Krishna Gopal Goswami, Mathura
Respondent I.T.O., Ward-3(2), Mathura
Appeal Type Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date 31-07-2012
Appeal Filed By Assessee
Order Result Dismissed
Bench Allotted DB
Tribunal Order Date 31-07-2012
Date Of Final Hearing 31-07-2012
Next Hearing Date 31-07-2012
Assessment Year 2007-2008
Appeal Filed On 15-09-2011
Judgment Text
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AGRA BENCH AGRA BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI A.L. GEHLOT ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO.356/AGR/2011 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2007-08 KRISHNA GOPAL GOSWAMI VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER 133 SARANGI BIHARIPURA WARD 3(2) MATHURA. VRINDABAN DISTT. MATHURA. (PAN: AEFPG 0729 M) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SHRI A.K. SHARMA JR. D.R. DATE OF HEARING : 31.07.2012 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT OF ORDER : 31.07.2012 ORDER PER A.L. GEHLOT ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 30.03.2011 PASSED BY THE LD. CIT(A)-I AGRA FOR THE A.Y. 2007- 08. 2. THE NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SENT TO THE ASSESSEE F IXING THE DATE ON 20.06.2012. ON 20.06.2012 AS PER THE REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEES COUNSEL THE DATE OF HEARING WAS ADJOURNED TO 31.07.2012 AND THE SAME WAS ANNOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT. HOWEVER ON 31.07.2012 I.E. TODAY AT THE TIME OF H EARING NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF ITA NO.356/AGR/2011 A.Y. 2007-08 2 OF THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT HAS BEEN FILED. FROM THIS IT IS REASONABLE TO INFER THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT SERIOU S TO PURSUE ITS CASE. HONBLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. B.N. BHATTACHA RGEE AND ANOTHER 118 ITR 461(SC) OBSERVED THAT PREFERRING AN APPEAL MEANS EF FECTIVELY PURSUING IT. HONBLE M.P. HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJ IRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT 223 ITR 480(M.P.) DISMISSED THE REFERENCE FILED BY THE ASSE SSEE FOR NOT TAKING NECESSARY STEPS. SIMILAR VIEW IS TAKEN BY I.T.A.T. DELHI BE NCH IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD. 38 ITD 320. CONSIDERING THE ABOVE IT APPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING ITS APPEAL. WE THEREFOR E DISMISS THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR NON-PROSECUTION. 3. IN THE RESULT THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESS EE IS DISMISSED IN LIMINE. (ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 31.07.2012) SD/- SD/- (BHAVNESH SAINI) (A.L. GEHLOT) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER PBN/* COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/CIT CONCERNED/CIT (APPEALS) C ONCERNED/ D.R. ITAT AGRA BENCH AGRA/GUARD FILE. BY ORDER SR. PRIVATE SECRETARY INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AGRA TRUE COPY