Mr. B.R. Malik,, Rohtak v. ITO, Sonepat

ITA 3631/DEL/2009 | 2004-2005
Pronouncement Date: 03-03-2011 | Result: Dismissed

Appeal Details

RSA Number 363120114 RSA 2009
Bench Delhi
Appeal Number ITA 3631/DEL/2009
Duration Of Justice 1 year(s) 6 month(s) 8 day(s)
Appellant Mr. B.R. Malik,, Rohtak
Respondent ITO, Sonepat
Appeal Type Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date 03-03-2011
Appeal Filed By Assessee
Order Result Dismissed
Bench Allotted A
Tribunal Order Date 03-03-2011
Date Of Final Hearing 03-03-2011
Next Hearing Date 03-03-2011
Assessment Year 2004-2005
Appeal Filed On 25-08-2009
Judgment Text
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH `A NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI A.D. JAIN AND SHRI A.K. GARODIA ITA NO. 3631 (DEL)2009 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2004-05 MR. B.R. MALIK PROP. BALAJI ENTERPRISES INCOME TAX OFFICER ISMAILA R/O 22 SECTOR 14 ROHTAK. V. WARD 4 SONIPAT ROHTAK. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : MRS. ANUSHA KHURANA SR.DR ORDER PER A.D. JAIN J.M. THIS IS ASSESSEES APPEAL FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2004-05. 2. NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE DESPITE SENDING NOTICE FOR HEARING WHICH HAS NOT RETURNED UNSERVED. THEREF ORE CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND KEEPING IN MIND THE PROVISIONS OF RULE 19(2) OF THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RULES AS WERE CONSIDERED IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD. REPORTED IN 38 ITD 320(DEL) WE TREAT THIS APPEAL AS UN-ADMITTED. THE ASSESSEE IF SO ADVISED SHALL BE FREE TO MOVE THIS TRIBUNAL PRAYING FOR RECALLING OF THIS ORDER AND EXPLAINING THE REASONS FOR NON- ITA NO. 3631(DEL)09 2 COMPLIANCE ETC. AND IF THE BENCH IS SO SATISFIED AB OUT THE REASONS ETC. THEN THIS ORDER SHALL BE RECALLED. 3. IN THE RESULT THE ASSESSEES APPEAL IS DISMISSE D. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 03.03.2011. SD/- SD/- (A.K. GARODIA) (A.D. JAIN) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 03.03.2011 *RM COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT. 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT(A) 4. CIT 5. DR TRUE COPY BY ORDER DEPUTY REGISTRAR .