M/s. Suryavinayak Engineers, Baroda v. The Income tax Officer,Ward-2(5),, Baroda

ITA 3667/AHD/2008 | 2005-2006
Pronouncement Date: 12-01-2011 | Result: Dismissed

Appeal Details

RSA Number 366720514 RSA 2008
Bench Ahmedabad
Appeal Number ITA 3667/AHD/2008
Duration Of Justice 2 year(s) 2 month(s) 4 day(s)
Appellant M/s. Suryavinayak Engineers, Baroda
Respondent The Income tax Officer,Ward-2(5),, Baroda
Appeal Type Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date 12-01-2011
Appeal Filed By Assessee
Order Result Dismissed
Bench Allotted C
Tribunal Order Date 12-01-2011
Date Of Final Hearing 12-01-2011
Next Hearing Date 12-01-2011
Assessment Year 2005-2006
Appeal Filed On 07-11-2008
Judgment Text
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD BENCH AHMEDABAD BENCH AHMEDABAD BENCH AHMEDABAD BENCH C CC C BEFORE BEFORE BEFORE BEFORE SHRI SHRI SHRI SHRI N NN N. .. .S. SAINI S. SAINI S. SAINI S. SAINI ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND AND AND AND SHRI SHRI SHRI SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH JUDICIAL MEMBER MAHAVIR SINGH JUDICIAL MEMBER MAHAVIR SINGH JUDICIAL MEMBER MAHAVIR SINGH JUDICIAL MEMBER DATE OF HEARING :12-1-2011 DRAFTED ON:12 -1-11. ITA NO. 3667 /AHD/ 2008 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2005-06 M /S. SURYAVINAYAK ENGINEERS 81/4 G.I.D.C. NR. INDIAN ALUMINIMUM CO. MAKARPURA BARODA. VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(5) AAYAKAR BHAVAN NR. RACE COURSE CIRCLE BARODA. PAN/GIR NO. : AAWFS 89188 H (A PPELLANT ) .. ( RESPONDENT ) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY: SHRI ROBIN RAWAL D.R. O R D E R O R D E R O R D E R O R D E R PER N.S.SAINI ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :- THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST TH E ORDER OF THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)-II BARODA DATED 15-9-2008. 2. EARLIER THE CASE WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 18-11- 2010 WHEN THE LEARNED AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ASSESSEE SMT. URVA SHI SHODHAN ADVOCATE SOUGHT AN ADJOURNMENT ON THE GROUND THAT SHE WANTS TO FILE A PAPER BOOK AND THE CASE WAS ADJOURNED TO 12-01-2011. TODAY THE LEA RNED AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ASSESSEE SMT. URVASHI SHODHAN ADVOCATE HAS FILED AN APPLICATION IN THE COURT STATING THAT SHE IS WITHDR AWING FROM THE CASE. THERE IS NO ADJOURNMENT APPLICATION FILED FROM THE ASSESSEE. THIS SHOWS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT SERIOUS IN CONTESTING THIS APPEAL. THEREFORE FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE HON'BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT D ECISION IN THE CASE OF TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR 223 ITR 480 AND THE DECISION OF TH E ITAT DELHI BENCH IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN INDIA PVT. LTD. 38 ITD 320 THE A PPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED IN LIMINE. PAGE 2 OF 2 3. IN THE RESULT THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT AT THE CLOSE OF THE HE ARING ON 12 TH DAY OF JANUARY 2011. SD/- SD/- ( MAHAVIR SINGH) (N.S. S AINI) JUDICIAL MEMBER A CCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: AHMEDABAD 12 TH DAY OF JANUARY 2011. COMPILED AND COMPARED BY: PATKI COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. THE CIT CONCERNED 4. THE LD. CIT(APPEALS)- 5. THE DR AHMEDABAD BENCH 6. THE GUARD FILE. BY ORDER //TRUE COPY// (DY./ASSTT.REGISTRAR) ITAT AHMEDABAD DATE INITIALS 1. DRAFT DICTATED ON 12-1-2011 --------------- ---- 2. DRAFT PLACED BEFORE AUTHORITY 12-1-2011 ------ ------------- 3. DRAFT PROPOSED & PLACED 12-1-2011 -------- ----------- JM BEFORE THE SECOND MEMBER 4. DRAFT DISCUSSED/APPROVED 12-1-2011 ---------- --------- JM/AM BY SECOND MEMBER 5. APPROVED DRAFT COMES TO P.S 12-1-2011 ------- ------------- 6. KEPT FOR PRONOUNCEMENT ON 12-1-2011 ---------- ---------- 7. FILE SENT TO THE BENCH CLERK 13-1-2011 ------- ------------- 8. DATE ON WHICH FILE GOES TO THE --------------- -------------------- A.R. 9. DATE OF DISPATCH OF ORDER --------------- ---- -----------------