RANGEELA EXPORTS, MUMBAI v. ADDL CIT RG 13(1), MUMBAI

ITA 4114/MUM/2009 | 2006-2007
Pronouncement Date: 30-03-2010 | Result: Dismissed

Appeal Details

RSA Number 411419914 RSA 2009
Assessee PAN AADFR4227V
Bench Mumbai
Appeal Number ITA 4114/MUM/2009
Duration Of Justice 8 month(s) 27 day(s)
Appellant RANGEELA EXPORTS, MUMBAI
Respondent ADDL CIT RG 13(1), MUMBAI
Appeal Type Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date 30-03-2010
Appeal Filed By Assessee
Order Result Dismissed
Bench Allotted D
Tribunal Order Date 30-03-2010
Assessment Year 2006-2007
Appeal Filed On 03-07-2009
Judgment Text
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH D: MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI J. SUDHAKAR REDDY (AM) AND SHRI R.S. PADVEKAR (JM) ITA NO. 4114/MUM/2009 (ASSTT. YEAR : 2005-06) RANGEELA EXPORTS APPELLANT 246 INDIA HOUSE ABDUL REHMAN STREET MUMBAI 400 003 PAN : AADFR4227 V/S. ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RESPONDENT RANGE -13(1) MUMBAI APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SHRI ANKUR GARG : O R D E R : PER R.S. PADVEKAR J.M THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED THIS APPEAL CHALLENGING THE IMPUGNED ORDERS OF THE CIT(A)- XIII MUMBAI DATED 16.04.2009 FOR T HE A.Y. 2005-06. 2. THIS APPEAL WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 25.3.2010. NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SENT TO THE ASSESSEE AS PER ADDRESS GIVEN IN THE AP PEAL MEMO BY REGISTERED POST A.D INTIMATING THE DATE OF HEARING WHICH HAS B EEN RETURNED BY THE POSTAL AUTHORITIES WITH REMARK THAT NOT KNOWN AT GIVEN A DDRESS RETURNED TO SENDER. NO OTHER ADDRESS IS AVAILABLE ON RECORD. IF THERE IS A CHANGE OF THE ADDRESS THEN THE ASSESSEE SHOULD HAVE INFORMED THE SAME TO THE REGISTRY BY CARRYING OUT NECESSARY AMENDMENT TO THE APPEAL MEMO BUT NOTHING HAS BEEN DONE. MOREOVER IT IS SEEN THAT CERTAIN DEFECTS WE RE POINTED OUT BY THE REGISTRY BUT THOSE ARE ALSO NOT REMOVED. WE ARE THEREFORE OF THE OPINION THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. WE THEREFORE ITA NO. 4114/MUM/2009 2 DISMISS THIS APPEAL AS NOT ADMITTED BY FOLLOWING TH E PRINCIPLES LAID DOWN BY THE HONBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE O F ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR V/S. CWT (223 ITR 480(MP) AND BY THE DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF CIT V/S. MULTIPLAN (INDIA) PVT. LTD. 3 8 ITD 320 (DEL). 3. IN THE RESULT THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 30TH DAY OF MARCH 2010. SD/- SD/- (J. SUDHAKAR REDDY) (R.S. PADVEKAR) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER MUMBAI ON THIS 30TH DAY OF MARCH 2010. :US COPY TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3.THE CIT(A)- XIII MUMBAI 4.THE CIT -13 MUMBAI 5.THE DR D BENCH MUMBAI 6.GUARD FILE BY ORDER TRUE COPY ASSTT..REGISTRAR ITAT MUMBAI. ITA NO. 4114/MUM/2009 3 US DATE INITIALS 1. DRAFT DICTATED ON 25/3/10 --------------- SR.P.S . 2. DRAFT PLACED BEFORE AUTHORITY 26/3/10 --------- ----- SR.P.S. 3. DRAFT PROPOSED & PLACED ----------- ---------- --- JM BEFORE THE SECOND MEMBER 4. DRAFT DISCUSSED/APPROVED ----------- ----------- -- JM/AM BY SECOND MEMBER 5. APPROVED DRAFT COMES TO ----------- ------------ - SR.P.S. THE SR. P.S./P.S 6. KEPT FOR PRONOUNCEMENT ON --------- ----------- -- SR.P.S. 7. FILE SENT TO THE BENCH CLERK --------- --------- ---- SR.P.S. 8. DATE ON WHICH FILE GOES TO THE ------- --------- ---- 9. DATE OF DISPATCH OF ORDER --------- --------- ----