Dhanraksha Vincom (P) Ltd, Kolkata v. ITO, Ward-10(2), , Kolkata

ITA 422/KOL/2020 | 2012-2013
Pronouncement Date: 10-11-2021 | Result: PartlyAllowed

Appeal Details

RSA Number 42223514 RSA 2020
Bench Kolkata
Appeal Number ITA 422/KOL/2020
Duration Of Justice 1 year(s) 4 month(s) 8 day(s)
Appellant Dhanraksha Vincom (P) Ltd, Kolkata
Respondent ITO, Ward-10(2), , Kolkata
Appeal Type Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date 10-11-2021
Appeal Filed By Assessee
Order Result PartlyAllowed
Bench Allotted B
Assessment Year 2012-2013
Appeal Filed On 02-07-2020
Judgment Text
1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH KOLKATA (E-COURT HEARING) BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY JM AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL AM आयकरअपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 422/Kol/2020 (िनधाŊरण वषŊ / Assessment Year: 2012-13) M/s. Dhanraksha Vincom Pvt. Ltd. Salarpuria Jajodia & Co. 3 rd Floor 7 Chittaranjan Avenue Kolkata – 700072 बनाम/ Vs. ITO Ward-10(2) Kolkata Aaykar Bhawan P-7 Chowringhee Square Kolkata - 700069 ̾थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AADCD-6028-P (अपीलाथŎ/Appellant) : (ŮȑथŎ / Respondent) Assessee by : None Revenue by : Ms. Ranu Biswas Addl. CIT-Ld. Sr. DR सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date of Hearing : 11/11/2021 घोषणा की तारीख / Date of Pronouncement : 11/11/2021 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) 1. Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2012-13 arises out of the order the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 16 Kolkata [CIT(A)] dated 06.10.2017 in the matter of assessment framed by the Ld. AO u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act 1961 on 23.03.2016. 2. As per revised Form-36 the appeal is delayed by 42 days. The condonation of delay has been sought by the assessee on the strength of condonation petition wherein it has been submitted that delay has occurred due to ongoing pandemic. Considering the contents of 2 condonation petition and period of delay the delay is condoned and the appeal is admitted for adjudication on merits. 3. At the time of hearing none appeared for assessee. The Ld. Sr. DR pleaded for dismissal of the appeal on the ground that the assessee failed to appear before learned first appellate authority also. 4. After going through impugned order though we concur with the submissions of Ld. Sr. DR that the assessee has remained negligent in attending the appellate proceedings however keeping in view the principles of natural justice we deem it fit to provide another opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Therefore the impugned order is set-aside and the matter is restored back to the file of Ld. CIT(A) for fresh adjudication after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee in turn is directed to substantiate its claim failing which Ld. CIT(A) shall be at liberty to adjudicate the issue by passing a speaking order on the basis of material on record. 5. The appeal stand allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 11 th November 2021. Sd/- Sd/- (Aby T. Varkey) (Manoj Kumar Aggarwal) Ɋाियक सद˟ / Judicial Member लेखा सद˟ / Accountant Member Kolkata; िदनांक Dated: 11/11/2021 Biswajit Sr. P.S. 3 आदेशकीŮितिलिपअŤेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथŎ/ The Appellant: M/s. Dhanraksha Vincom Pvt. Ltd. 2. ŮȑथŎ/ The Respondent: ITO Ward-10(2) 3. आयकरआयुƅ(अपील) / The CIT(A) 4. आयकरआयुƅ/ CIT– concerned 5. िवभागीयŮितिनिध आयकरअपीलीयअिधकरण DR ITAT 6. गाडŊफाईल / Guard File आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER Senior P.S आयकरअपीलीयअिधकरण ITAT Kolkata.