Sanjay Gupta, Delhi v. ACIT, New Delhi

ITA 443/DEL/2012 | 2002-2003
Pronouncement Date: 13-11-2017 | Result: Dismissed

Appeal Details

RSA Number 44320114 RSA 2012
Assessee PAN AELPG6586L
Bench Delhi
Appeal Number ITA 443/DEL/2012
Duration Of Justice 5 year(s) 9 month(s) 14 day(s)
Appellant Sanjay Gupta, Delhi
Respondent ACIT, New Delhi
Appeal Type Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date 13-11-2017
Appeal Filed By Assessee
Tags No record found
Order Result Dismissed
Bench Allotted G
Tribunal Order Date 13-11-2017
Date Of Final Hearing 23-05-2017
Next Hearing Date 23-05-2017
First Hearing Date 23-05-2017
Assessment Year 2002-2003
Appeal Filed On 30-01-2012
Judgment Text
PAGE 1 OF 3 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH SMC: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 443/DEL/2012 A.Y.: 2002-03 SANJAY GUPTA VS. DCIT CIRCLE 20(1) D-BLOCK S/O SH. SATYA PARKASH GUPTA VIKAS BHAWAN A-1 CC COLONY I.P. ESTATE NEW DELHI 110 002 DELHI 110 007 (PAN: AELPG6586L) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE DEPARTMENT BY : NONE O R D E R THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINS T THE ORDER DATED 17.11.2011 OF THE LD. CIT(A)-XXII NEW DELHI RE LEVANT TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2002-03. 2. EARLIER THIS CASE CAME UP FOR HEARING BEFORE THE BEN CH ON 21.09.2017 AND ON THE WRITTEN REQUEST OF THE ASSESSE E THE CASE WAS ADJOURNED FOR 13.11.2017 AND BOTH THE PARTIES WERE INF ORMED IN THE COURT. 3. ON 13.11.2017 I.E. TODAY NEITHER THE ASSESSEE NO R HIS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE ATTENDED THE HEARING AND ALS O NOT FILED ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT AND ALSO NONE APPEARED O N BEHALF OF THE DEPARTMENT HENCE I AM OF THE VIEW THAT NO USEFU L PURPOSE WOULD BE SERVED TO SERVE THE NOTICE AGAIN AND AGAIN. IN VI EW OF ABOVE IT IS THUS INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTION OF HIS APPEAL. 4. HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF ITAT RULES AND FOLL OWING VARIOUS DECISIONS OF DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL INCLUDING T HAT OF MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD. : 38 ITD 320 (DELHI) AND HONBLE MADHYA PRAD ESH HIGH PAGE 2 OF 3 COURTS DECISION IN ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT; 223 ITR 480 (MP) I TREAT THIS APPEAL AS UNADMITTED AND DISMI SS THE SAME. I WOULD LIKE TO CLARIFY THAT SUBSEQUENTLY IF THE ASSE SSEE EXPLAINS THE REASONS FOR NON APPEARANCE AND IF THE BENCH IS SO SAT ISFIED THE MATTER MAY BE RECALLED FOR THE PURPOSE OF ADJUDICATION OF THE APPEAL. 5. IN THE RESULT THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED IN LIMINE. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON 13-11-2017. SD/- [H.S. SIDHU] JUDICIAL MEMBER DATE:13/11/2017 SRBHATNAGAR COPY FORWARDED TO: - 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4.CIT (A) 5. DR ITAT TRUE COPY BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT DELHI BENCHES PAGE 3 OF 3