Planman Consulting (India) Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi v. Addl.CIT, Special Range-7, New Delhi

ITA 4805/DEL/2018 | 2014-2015
Pronouncement Date: 28-05-2021 | Result: Dismissed

Appeal Details

RSA Number 480520114 RSA 2018
Assessee PAN AAACP9503C
Bench Delhi
Appeal Number ITA 4805/DEL/2018
Duration Of Justice 2 year(s) 10 month(s) 23 day(s)
Appellant Planman Consulting (India) Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi
Respondent Addl.CIT, Special Range-7, New Delhi
Appeal Type Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date 28-05-2021
Appeal Filed By Assessee
Order Result Dismissed
Bench Allotted F
Tribunal Order Date 28-05-2021
Assessment Year 2014-2015
Appeal Filed On 05-07-2018
Judgment Text
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI A BENCH: NEW DELHI (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING ) BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI AMIT SHUKLA JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO.4805/DEL/2018 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2014-15 PLANMAN CONSULTING (INDIA) PVT.LTD. 48 COMMUNITY CENTRE PHASE- I NARAINA INDUSTRIAL AREA NEW DELHI-110028. PAN-AAACP9503C VS ADDL. CIT SPECIAL RANGE-7 NEW DELHI. APPELLANT RESPONDENT APPELLANT BY MS. AKANSHA DAWAR CA RESPONDENT BY SH. MAHESH THAKUR SR. DR DATE OF HEARING 28.05.2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 28.05.2021 ORDER PER G.S. PANNU VP : THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEA R 2014-15 IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF LEARNED CIT(A)-38 DELHI D ATED 20.02.2018. 2. THE ASSESSEE VIDE ITS LETTER DATED 07.04.2021 RECEIVE D THROUGH EMAIL HAS REQUESTED FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL FILED BY HER AND STATED THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE RELA TING TO THE TAX ARREARS FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR UNDER CONSIDERATION UN DER THE VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME 2020. 3. CONSIDERING THE AFORESAID SITUATION THE CAPTIONED APPEA L IS CONSIGNED TO RECORDS AND TREATED AS DISMISSED. 4. HOWEVER THE AFORESAID IS SUBJECT TO A CAVEAT THAT IN CASE THE DISPUTE RELATING TO TAX ARREARS FOR THE CAPTIONED ASSESS MENT YEAR IS NOT 2 ULTIMATELY RESOLVED IN TERMS OF THE AFORESTATED ACT THE APPELLANT (I.E. THE ASSESSEE) SHALL BE AT LIBERTY TO APPROACH THE TRIBUNAL FOR REINSTITUTION OF THE APPEAL AND THE TRIBUNAL SHALL CONSIDER SUCH APPLICATIO N APPROPRIATELY AS PER LAW. THE RESPONDENT (I.E. THE REVENUE ) HAS NO OBJECTION WITH REGARD TO THE AFORESAID CAVEAT. 5. IN VIEW OF THE AFORESAID THE APPEAL IS CONSIGNED TO REC ORD AND FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES IS TREATED AS DISMISSED. ABOVE DECISION WAS ANNOUNCED ON CONCLUSION OF VIRTUAL HE ARING IN THE PRESENCE OF BOTH THE PARTIES ON 28 TH MAY 2021. SD/- SD/- (AMIT SHUKLA) (G.S. PA NNU) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESID ENT * AMIT KUMAR * COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(APPEALS) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI