M S Robosoft Technologies Pvt Ltd Udupi v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 1 Udupi

ITA 497/BANG/2017 | misc
Pronouncement Date: 11-12-2017 | Result: Dismissed

Appeal Details

Note: Please login to view full details
RSA Number 49721114 RSA 2017
Assessee PAN xxxxxxxxxxx
Bench xxxxxxxxxxx
Appeal Number xxxxxxxxxxx
Duration Of Justice 9 month(s) 11 day(s)
Appellant xxxxxxxxxxx
Respondent xxxxxxxxxxx
Appeal Type Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date 11-12-2017
Appeal Filed By Assessee
Tags No record found
Order Result Dismissed
Bench Allotted A
Tribunal Order Date 11-12-2017
Last Hearing Date 20-09-2017
First Hearing Date 20-09-2017
Assessment Year misc
Appeal Filed On 01-03-2017
Judgment Text
Ita 497 To 500 Bang 2017 Page 1 In The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Bengaluru Bench A Bengaluru Before Shri A K Garodia Accountant Member And Shri Lalit Kumar Judicial Member I T A Nos 497 To 500 Bang 2017 Assessment Years 2010 11 To 2013 14 M S Robosoft Technologies P Ltd 217 N H 17 Santhekatte Udupi 576 105 Appellant Pan Aaccr 0768 B V Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 1 Udupi Respondent Assessee By None Revenue By Shri B R Ramesh Jcit Heard On 11 12 2017 Pronounced On 11 12 2017 O R D E R Per Bench These Are Four Appeals Filed By The Assessee Again St Different Orders Of The Cit A Mangaluru For The Assessmen T Years 2010 11 To 2013 14 Respectively Ita 497 To 500 Bang 2017 Page 2 02 When The Appeals Were Called Up For Hearing No Body Appeared For Assessee It Is Seen From Records That Inspite Of The Date Of Hearing Being Mentioned In The Notice Of Hearing Which Has Been Issued And Served On The Assessee By Registered Post Acknowled Gement Due Nobody Was Present On The Date Of Hearing In The Circumstances We Are Of The Opinion That The Assessee Is Not Interes Ted In Prosecuting Its Case We Dismiss The Appeals Following The Decisio N Of The Delhi Bench Of The Itat In Cit V Multiplan India P Ltd 1991 38 Itd 320 And Of The Madhya Pradesh High Court In The Cas E Of Estate Of Late Tukoji Rao Holkar V Cwt 1997 223 Itr 480 A S The Appeals Are Infructuous For Non Prosecution 03 In The Result Appeals Of The Assessee Are Dism Issed Order Pronounced In Open Court On The 11 Th Day Of December 2017 Sd Sd A K Garodia Lalit Kumar Accountant Member Judicial M Ember Bengaluru Dated 11 12 2017 Mcn Copy To 1 The Assessee 2 The Assessing Officer 3 The Commissioner Of Income Tax 4 Commissioner Of Income Tax A 5 Dr 6 Gf Itat Bangalore By Order Senior Private Secretary Ita 497 To 500 Bang 2017 Page 3