NAUSHAD M. MALLICK, MUMBAI v. ITO 3(1), MUMBAI

ITA 539/MUM/2016 | 2007-2008
Pronouncement Date: 27-11-2019 | Result: Dismissed

Our System has flagged this appeal as eligible for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. If you are party to this appeal, get on a Free Consultation Call with our team of Legal Experts who shall guide you as to how you can save huge Interest and Penalty in VSV Scheme.


Apply Now
        
Try VSV Calculator

Appeal Details

RSA Number 53919914 RSA 2016
Bench Mumbai
Appeal Number ITA 539/MUM/2016
Duration Of Justice 3 year(s) 9 month(s) 23 day(s)
Appellant NAUSHAD M. MALLICK, MUMBAI
Respondent ITO 3(1), MUMBAI
Appeal Type Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date 27-11-2019
Appeal Filed By Assessee
Order Result Dismissed
Bench Allotted Not Allotted
Tribunal Order Date 27-11-2019
Last Hearing Date 19-02-2018
First Hearing Date 19-02-2018
Assessment Year 2007-2008
Appeal Filed On 04-02-2016
Judgment Text
ITA NO.539/MUM/2016 SHRI NAUSHAD M. MALLICK ASSESSMENT YEAR :2007-08 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE HONBLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH JM AND HONBLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL AM ./ I.T.A. NO.539/MUM/2016 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2007-08) SHRI NAUSHAD M. MALLICK LAKE CASTLE C.H.S. C-WING FLAT NO.802 8 TH FLOOR HIRANANDANI GARDEN POWAI MUMBAI- 400 076. / VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER - 3(1) ASHAR I.T. PARK WAGLE INDUSTRIAL ESTATE MUMBAI- 400 604. )* ./ ./PAN/GIR NO. AIMPM-5059-P ( * /APPELLANT ) : ( -.* / RESPONDENT ) ASSESSEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : MS. KAVITA P. KAUSHIK- LD. DR / DATE OF HEARING : 27/11/2019 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 27/11/2019 / O R D E R MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) 1. AFORESAID APPEAL BY ASSESSEE FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR [IN SHORT REFERRED TO AS AY] 2007-08 CONTEST CONFIRMATION O F CERTAIN ADDITIONS BY LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS)-2 THANE. 2. WHEN THE APPEAL WAS CALLED FOR HEARING NONE APP EARED FOR THE ASSESSEE AND THEREFORE THE MATTER WAS PROCEEDED WI TH EX-PARTE QUA THE ASSESSEE. ITA NO.539/MUM/2016 SHRI NAUSHAD M. MALLICK ASSESSMENT YEAR :2007-08 2 3. THE LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE AT THE OUTS ET SUBMITTED THAT THE APPEAL WAS FILED WITH A DELAY OF 24 DAYS AND TH EREFORE THE APPEAL DESERVES TO BE DISMISSED ON THIS PRELIMINARY ISSUE. 4. UPON CAREFUL CONSIDERATION OF CASE-RECORDS WE F IND THAT REGISTRY HAS NOTED A DELAY OF 24 DAYS IN FILING OF THE APPEA L THE CONDONATION OF WHICH HAS BEEN SOUGHT BY THE ASSESSEE ON THE STRENG TH OF LETTERS DATED 15/12/2015 & 03/02/2016. HOWEVER WE FIND THAT NO S UPPORTING DOCUMENTS OR AFFIDAVIT AFFIRMING THE SAME HAS BEEN FILED. NOT CONVINCED WITH ASSESSEES SUBMISSIONS WE DISMISS THE APPEAL FOR WANT OF CONDONATION OF DELAY. 5. RESULTANTLY THE APPEAL STANDS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 27 TH NOVEMBER 2019. SD/- SD/- (MAHAVIR SINGH) (MA NOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) / JUDICIAL MEMBER / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI; DATED : 27/11/2019 SR.PS JAISY VARGHESE !'! / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. * / THE APPELLANT 2. -.* / THE RESPONDENT 3. 5 ( ) / THE CIT(A) 4. 5 / CIT CONCERNED 5. 67-08 8 / DR ITAT MUMBAI 6. 79:; / GUARD FILE / BY ORDER / (DY./ASSTT.REGISTRAR) / ITAT MUMBAI.