SADHNA SOAPS P. LTD, MUMBAI v. ITO 8(3)-1, MUMBAI

ITA 5534/MUM/2009 | 2006-2007
Pronouncement Date: 03-12-2010 | Result: Dismissed

Appeal Details

RSA Number 553419914 RSA 2009
Assessee PAN AAACS0662F
Bench Mumbai
Appeal Number ITA 5534/MUM/2009
Duration Of Justice 1 year(s) 1 month(s) 25 day(s)
Appellant SADHNA SOAPS P. LTD, MUMBAI
Respondent ITO 8(3)-1, MUMBAI
Appeal Type Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date 03-12-2010
Appeal Filed By Assessee
Order Result Dismissed
Bench Allotted I
Tribunal Order Date 03-12-2010
Date Of Final Hearing 25-11-2010
Next Hearing Date 25-11-2010
Assessment Year 2006-2007
Appeal Filed On 09-10-2009
Judgment Text
1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH I MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI J. SUDHAKAR REDDY ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. ASHA VIJAYRAGHAVAN JUDICIAL MEMBER. I.T.A. NO. 5534/MUM/2009. ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2006-07. SADHNA SOAPS P. LTD. THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER GROUND FLOOR VS. 8(3)-1 MUMBAI. SADHNA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE S.V.ROAD OSHIWARE JOGESHWARI (W) MUMBAI 400002. P.A. NO. AAACS0662F APPELLANT. RESPONDENT. APPELLANT BY : NONE. RESPONDENT BY : SHRI SANJEEV JA IN. O R D E R PER J. SUDHAKAR REDDY A.M. : THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAIN ST THE ORDER DATED 19-08- 2009 OF THE CIT(APPEALS)-XXIX MUMBAI FOR THE ASS ESSMENT YEAR 2006-07. 2. A NOTICE OF HEARING FIXING THE CAS E ON 19-08-2010 WAS ISSUED BY RPAD ON THE ADDRESS GIVEN IN FORM NO. 36. ON THIS DAT E THE ASSESSEE SOUGHT ADJOURNMENT VIDE ITS LETTER DATED 19-08-2010 WHICH WAS GRANTED AND THE CASE WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 25-11-2010. BOTH THE PARTIES WERE INFORMED ACCORDINGLY. NOBODY APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE ON THIS D ATE OF HEARING I.E. ON 25-11- 2 2010. NO APPLICATION SEEKING ADJOURNMENT OF THE C ASE HAS BEEN FILED. THUS IT SEEMS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSEC UTING THE APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL. THEREFORE FOLLOWING THE RATIO LAID DOWN BY THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN INDIA PVT. LTD. 38 ITD 320 AS WELL AS TH E JUDGEMENT OF HON'BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TU KOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT 223 ITR 480 THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMIS SED IN LIMINE. 3. HOWEVER IF THE ASSESSEE THROUGH PROPER APPL ICATION CAN SATISFY THE TRIBUNAL WITH THE REASON FOR SUCH NON-APPEARANCE ON THE DATE OF HEARING THE TRIBUNAL MAY AT ITS DISCRETION RECALL THE ORDER. 4. IN THE RESULT THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSES SEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 3 RD DEC. 2010. SD/- SD/- (ASHA VIJAYRAGHAVAN) (J. SUDHAKAR REDDY) JUDICIAL MEMBER. ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI DATED: 3 RD DEC. 2010. COPY TO : 1.APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. C.I.T. 4. CIT(A) 5. DR I-BENCH (TRUE COPY) BY ORDE R WAKODE ASSTT. REGISTRAR ITAT MUMBAI.