SUNIL HINGORANI, MUMBAI v. ACIT-16 (1) , MUMBAI

ITA 5876/MUM/2019 | 2013-2014
Pronouncement Date: 11-03-2021 | Result: Dismissed

Appeal Details

RSA Number 587619914 RSA 2019
Assessee PAN AAAOG1482P
Bench Mumbai
Appeal Number ITA 5876/MUM/2019
Duration Of Justice 1 year(s) 6 month(s)
Appellant SUNIL HINGORANI, MUMBAI
Respondent ACIT-16 (1) , MUMBAI
Appeal Type Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date 11-03-2021
Appeal Filed By Assessee
Order Result Dismissed
Bench Allotted G
Tribunal Order Date 11-03-2021
Last Hearing Date 11-03-2021
First Hearing Date 11-03-2021
Assessment Year 2013-2014
Appeal Filed On 11-09-2019
Judgment Text
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL E BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI S RIFAUR RAHMAN ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 5876/MUM/2019 (A.Y: 2013-14) SUNIL HINGORANI 8-B NIBHANA ANNEX PALI HILL BANDRA (W) MUMBAI. VS. ACIT - 16(1) R.NO. 439 4 TH FLOOR AAYAKAR BHAVAN CHURGATE MUMBAI. ./ ./ PAN/GIR NO. : AAAOG1482P APPELLANT .. RESPONDENT APPELLANT BY : SHRI KARAN LALA AR RESPONDENT BY : SHRI VIJAY KUMAR MENON DR DATE OF HEARING 11 .0 3 .2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 12 .0 3 .2021 / O R D E R PER PAVAN KUMAR GADALE: THIS APPEAL IS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE OR DER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) - 4 MUM BAI PASSED U/S. 143(3) AND 250 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1 961. 2. AT THE TIME HEARING THE LD. AR OF THE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS INTEND TO SETTLE THE TAX LITIGATION BY OPTING FOR VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME. CONTRA THE LD. DR HAS NO OBJECTIONS. 3. WE HEARD THE RIVAL SUBMISSIONS AND PERUSED THE MATERIAL ON RECORD. SINCE THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED F OR ITA NO. 5876/MUM/2019 SUNIL HINGORANI MUMBAI - 2 - VIVAAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME 2020 AS MENTIONED BY THE LD.AR AND FILED THE APPLICATION.WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT NO PURPOSE WILL BE SERVED IN KEEPING THE APPEAL PEN DING. ACCORDINGLY WE DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE AS WITHDRAWN AND THE ASSESSEE IS GIVEN LIBERTY TO MOVE AN APPLICATION U/S 254(2) OF THE ACT TO RECALL THE PRE SENT ORDER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF LAW. 4. IN THE RESULT THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 12.03.2021 SD/- SD/- (S RIFAUR RAHMAN) (PAVAN KUMAR GADALE) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER MUMBAI DATED 12.03.2021 KRK PS / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT. 3. / THE CIT(A) 4. ( ) / CONCERNED CIT 5. '#$%&&' )* / DR ITAT MUMBAI 6. %-./0 / GUARD FILE. / BY ORDER '& //TRUE COPY// 1. ( ASST. REGISTRAR) ITA NO. 5876/MUM/2019 SUNIL HINGORANI MUMBAI - 3 - ITAT MUMBA I DATE INITIAL 1. DRAFT DICTATED ON 10.03.21 PS 2. DRAFT PLACED BEFORE AUTHOR 10.03.21 PS 3. DRAFT PROPOSED & PLACED BEFORE THE SECOND MEMBER PS 4. DRAFT DISCUSSED/APPROVED BY SECOND MEMBER. PS 5. APPROVED DRAFT COMES TO THE SR.PS/PS PS 6. KEPT FOR PRONOUNCEMENT ON 7. FILE SENT TO THE BENCH CLERK 8. DATE ON WHICH FILE GOES TO THE AR 9. DATE ON WHICH FILE GOES TO THE HEAD CLERK. 10. DATE OF DISPATCH OF ORDER. 11. DICTATION PAD IS ENCLOSED 2. OTHER MEMBER ON WHI