RSA Number | 59723314 RSA 2009 |
---|---|
Assessee PAN | ACAPB7786Q |
Bench | Jodhpur |
Appeal Number | ITA 597/JODH/2009 |
Duration Of Justice | 1 year(s) 1 month(s) 25 day(s) |
Appellant | Sidharth Bansal Prop. M/s. Radha Krishna, MAKRANA |
Respondent | ITO, MAKRANA |
Appeal Type | Income Tax Appeal |
Pronouncement Date | 02-02-2011 |
Appeal Filed By | Assessee |
Order Result | Dismissed |
Bench Allotted | DB |
Tribunal Order Date | 03-02-2011 |
Date Of Final Hearing | 12-06-2014 |
Next Hearing Date | 12-06-2014 |
Assessment Year | 2006-2007 |
Appeal Filed On | 07-12-2009 |
Judgment Text |
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL JODHPUR BENCH JODHPUR BEFORE SHRI S.V. MEHROTRA ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI V.D. RAO JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 597/JU/2009 ASSTT. YEAR : 2006-07 SIDHARTH BANSAL VS. INCOME-TAX OFFICER KRISHNA MARBLES MAKRANA. WARD 2 MAKRANA. (PAN ACAPB 7786 Q) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SHRI AVADHESH KUMAR D.R. O R D E R PER S.V. MEHROTRA A.M : THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST TH E ORDER PASSED BY THE LD. CIT(A) DATED 02.09.2009. 2. WHEN THIS APPEAL WAS TAKEN UP FOR HEARING NOBOD Y APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE DESPITE NOTICE THROUGH REGD. AD SERVED UPO N THE ASSESSEE NOR WAS THERE ANY REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT. IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES IT A PPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING ITS APPEAL. WE THEREFORE DISMISS THIS APPEAL FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF DELHI BENCH OF ITAT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD. (1991) 38 ITD 320 AND ALSO OF M.P. HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKHOJI RAO HOLKAR VS. CWT (1997) 223 ITR 480 AS THE APPEAL BECOMES I NFRUCTUOUS FOR NON-PROSECUTION. 3. IN THE RESULT THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED. THE ORDE R WAS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT IMMEDIATELY AFTER CONCLUSION OF HEARING ON 02.02.20 11. SD/- SD/- (V.D. RAO) (S.V. MEHROTRA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCO UNTANT MEMBER DATED : 3 RD FEBRUARY 2011 2 *AKS/- COPY FORWARDED TO:- 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. INCOME-TAX OFFICER 4. CIT 5. D/R 6. GUARD FILE
|