M S Shree Bihari Forgings Pvt Ltd New Delhi v. Ito New Delhi

ITA 6083/DEL/2014 | 2010-2011
Pronouncement Date: 21-12-2017 | Result: Dismissed

Appeal Details

Note: Please login to view full details
RSA Number 608320114 RSA 2014
Assessee PAN xxxxxxxxxxx
Bench xxxxxxxxxxx
Appeal Number xxxxxxxxxxx
Duration Of Justice 3 year(s) 1 month(s) 14 day(s)
Appellant xxxxxxxxxxx
Respondent xxxxxxxxxxx
Appeal Type Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date 21-12-2017
Appeal Filed By Assessee
Tags No record found
Order Result Dismissed
Bench Allotted G
Tribunal Order Date 21-12-2017
Assessment Year 2010-2011
Appeal Filed On 07-11-2014
Judgment Text
Page 1 Of 2 In The Income Tax Appelate Tribunal Delhi Bench G New Delhi Before Shri H S Sidhu Judicial Member And Shri B P Jain Accountant Member Ita No 6083 Del 2014 A Y 2010 11 M S Shree Bihari Forgings Pvt Ltd Vs Income Ta X Officer 2127 Nai Basti Ward 8 3 Narela C R Building Delhi 110 040 New Delhi Pan Aabcs 7582 D Appellant Respondent Assessee By None Department By Sh Kaushlendra Tiwari Sr Dr O R D E R Per H S Sidhu Jm This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Again St The Order Dated 05 9 2014 Of The Ld Cit A Xi New Delhi Relev Ant To Assessment Year 2010 11 2 In This Case The Notice Was Sent To The Assesse E For Hearing By Regd Ad Post For Today I E 21 12 2017 At The Addre Ss Mentioned In Form No 36 Vide Column No 10 But The Same Was Ret Urned Back 3 On 21 12 2017 Neither The Assessee Nor Its Auth Orised Representative Attended The Hearing And Also Not File D Any Application For Adjournment By The Assessee And Not Filed Any Fre Sh Address Before The Tribunal Hence We Are Of The View That No Useful Purpose Would Be Served To Send The Notice Again And Again To The Assessee In View Of Above It Is Thus Inferred That The Assessee Is Not Interested In Prosecution Of Its Appeal Page 2 Of 2 4 Having Regard To Rule 19 2 Of Itat Rules And Foll Owing Various Decisions Of Delhi Bench Of The Tribunal Including T Hat Of Multiplan India Ltd 38 Itd 320 Delhi And Honble Madhya Prad Esh High Courts Decision In Estate Of Late Tukojirao Holkar Vs Cwt 223 Itr 480 Mp We Treat This Appeal As Unadmitted And Dism Iss The Same We Would Like To Clarify That Subsequently If The As Sessee Explains The Reasons For Non Appearance And If The Bench Is So Sat Isfied The Matter May Be Recalled For The Purpose Of Adjudication Of The Appeal 5 In The Result The Appeal Of The Assessee Is Dis Missed In Limine Order Pronounced On 21 12 2017 Sd Sd B P Jain H S Sidhu Accountant Member Judicial Member Date 21 12 2017 Srbhatnagar Copy Forwarded To 1 Appellant 2 Respondent 3 Cit 4 Cit A 5 Dr Itat True Copy By Order Assistant Registrar Itat Delhi Benches