SHIRLEY N. RAJWANI, MUMBAI v. ITO WD 22(2)(2), MUMBAI

ITA 6381/MUM/2009 | 2004-2005
Pronouncement Date: 15-07-2011 | Result: Dismissed

Appeal Details

RSA Number 638119914 RSA 2009
Assessee PAN AAIPR2579P
Bench Mumbai
Appeal Number ITA 6381/MUM/2009
Duration Of Justice 1 year(s) 7 month(s) 5 day(s)
Appellant SHIRLEY N. RAJWANI, MUMBAI
Respondent ITO WD 22(2)(2), MUMBAI
Appeal Type Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date 15-07-2011
Appeal Filed By Assessee
Order Result Dismissed
Bench Allotted H
Tribunal Order Date 15-07-2011
Date Of Final Hearing 25-09-2013
Next Hearing Date 25-09-2013
Assessment Year 2004-2005
Appeal Filed On 10-12-2009
Judgment Text
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH H MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI P.M.JAGTAP ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI R.S. PADVEKAR JUDICIAL MEMBER. I.T.A. NO. 6381/MUM/2009. ASSESS MENT YEAR : 2004-05 SHIRLEY N. RAJWANI THE INCOME TAX OFFICER 73 JAIHIND MARKET DR. C.G. ROAD VS. WARD-22(2)(2) CHEMBUR COLONY MUMBAI. MUMBAI 400 074. PAN AAIPR 2579P APPELLANT. RESPONDENT. APPELLANT BY : RESPO NDENT BY : SHRI T.T. JACOB. O R D E R. PER P.M. JAGTAP A.M. : THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAI NST THE ORDER OF LEARNED CIT(APPEALS)-33 MUMBAI DATED 22-09-2009. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING FIXED IN THIS CASE ON 07- 07-2011 NOBODY HAS PUT IN APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY APPLIC ATION FOR ADJOURNMENT HAS BEEN MOVED DESPITE THE FACT THAT NOTICE OF THE HEARING WAS SENT TO THE ASSESSEE AT THE ADDRESS GIVEN IN THE APPEAL MEMO BY RPAD WELL IN AD VANCE A PROOF OF WHICH IS ON RECORD. THE DATE OF HEARING WAS ALSO GIVEN ON NO TICE BOARD FROM TIME TO TIME. IT APPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE THUS IS NOT SERIOUSLY INT ERESTED IN PROSECUTING THIS APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL. 2 ITA NO.6381/MUM/2009 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2004-05. 3. CONSIDERING THE FACTS NARRATED ABOVE AND KEEPING IN MIND THE PROVISIONS OF RULE 19(2) OF THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RULES AS CONSI DERED BY THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN (INDIA) P. LTD. 38 ITD 3 20 (DEL.) AND BY HONBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF LATE TUKOJ IRAO HOLKAR 223 ITR 480 (M.P.) THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS TREATED AS U NADMITTED AND DISMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION. THE ASSESSEE IF SO ADVISED SHALL BE FREE TO MOVE THE TRIBUNAL EXPLAINING THE REASONS FOR NON COMPLIANCE AND FOR R ECALLING OF THIS ORDER AND IF THE BENCH IS SO SATISFIED THEN THIS ORDER MAY BE RECAL LED. 4. IN THE RESULT THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. . ORDER PRONOUNCED ON THIS 15 TH DAY OF JULY 2011. SD/- SD/- (R.S. PADVEKAR) (P.M. JAGTAP) JUDICIAL MEMBER A CCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI DATED: 15 TH JULY 2011. COPY TO : 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. C.I.T. 4. CIT(A) 5. DR H-BENCH. (TRUE COPY ) BY ORD ER ASSTT. R EGISTRAR ITAT MUMBAI BEN CHES MUMBA I. WAKODE