Bhaskar Pranlal Vibhakar,, Ahmedabad v. ITO, Ward-5(2),, Ahmedabad

ITA 658/AHD/2018 | 2005-2006
Pronouncement Date: 12-03-2021 | Result: Dismissed

Appeal Details

RSA Number 65820514 RSA 2018
Assessee PAN ACSPV3764A
Bench Ahmedabad
Appeal Number ITA 658/AHD/2018
Duration Of Justice 2 year(s) 11 month(s) 27 day(s)
Appellant Bhaskar Pranlal Vibhakar,, Ahmedabad
Respondent ITO, Ward-5(2),, Ahmedabad
Appeal Type Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date 12-03-2021
Appeal Filed By Assessee
Order Result Dismissed
Bench Allotted SMC
Tribunal Order Date 12-03-2021
Date Of Final Hearing 24-03-2020
Next Hearing Date 24-03-2020
Last Hearing Date 22-01-2020
First Hearing Date 11-09-2019
Assessment Year 2005-2006
Appeal Filed On 15-03-2018
Judgment Text
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD SMC BENCH ( CONVENED THROUGH VIRTUAL COURT ) BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI WASEEM AHMED ACCOUNTANT MEMBER S.NO APPEAL A.Y. APPELLANT (PAN NO.) RESPONDENT A.R. 1 ITA NO. 658 /AHD/2018 2005-06 BHASKAR PRANLAL VIBHAKAR (ACSPV3764A) INCOME-TAX OFFICER WARD- 5(2) AHMEDABAD SHRI P.B. PARMAR 2 ITA NO. 659/ AHD/2018 2005-06 MINAXI BHASKAR VIBHAKAR (ABHPV0080B) INCOME-TAX OFFICER WARD- 5(2) AHMEDABAD SHRI P.B. PARMAR 3 ITA NO. 660 /AHD/2018 2005-06 NALIN P. VIBHAKAR (ABKPV0863B) INCOME-TAX OFFICER WARD- 5(2) AHMEDABAD SHRI P.B. PARMAR 4-5 ITA NO. 304 & 305/AHD/2017 2008-09 & 2009- 10 M/S. D R PETROCHEM PRIVATE LIMITED (AAACD 6948D) INCOME-TAX OFFICER WARD- 1(1)(2) VADODARA SHRI MANISH J. SHAH REVENUE BY : SHRI LALIT P. JAIN SR. D.R. / DATE OF HEARING 10/03/2021 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 12/03/2021 / O R D E R PER BENCH THE CAPTIONED FIVE APPEALS ARISE FROM THE RESPECTIVE ORDERS OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) (CIT(A)) AGAINST DIFFERENT ASSESSMENT YEARS. ITA NO. 658/AHD/18 & 4 ORS. - 2 - 2. THE CAPTIONED ASSESSEES HAVE SOUGHT TO WITHDRAW THE APPEALS LISTED ABOVE ON THE GROUND THAT THEY HAVE OPTED TO AVAIL BENEFITS OF VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME 2020 (VSV). WHEN THE MATTER WAS CALLED FOR HEARING THE LD. COUNSELS FOR THE ASSESSEE AT THE OUTSET HAVE SUBMITTED THAT THEY DO NOT SEEK TO PURSUE THE SAID APPEALS OWING TO EXERCISE OF OPTION FOR AVAILING VSV SCHEME AND CONSEQUENTLY REQUESTED THAT THEIR APPLICATIONS FOR WITHDRAWAL OF APPEALS MAY PLEASE BE GRANTED. REFERENCE WAS ALSO MADE TO WRITTEN REQUESTS IN THIS REGARD. 3. THE LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE REVENUE STATED THAT HE HAS NO OBJECTION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEALS IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES NARRATED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. 4. IN THE LIGHT OF ORAL/WRITTEN REQUESTS MADE ON BEHALF OF THE CAPTIONED PARTIES ALL THE APPEALS ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. HOWEVER IN THE EVENT THE ASSESSEE FAILS TO AVAIL THE BENEFIT OF VSV SCHEME FOR ANY BONAFIDE REASONS THEN THE ASSESSEE CONCERNED WILL BE AT LIBERTY TO SEEK RESTORATION OF ORIGINAL APPEALS FOR HEARING BEFORE ITAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. 5. IN THE RESULT ALL CAPTIONED APPEALS ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. SD/- SD/- (WASEEM AHMED) (MAHAVIR PRASAD) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER TRUE COPY JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMEDABAD: DATED 12/03/2021 RAJESH KUMAR / COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO:- THIS ORDER PRONOUNCED ON 12/03/2021