M/s. Agico Controls Pvt. Ltd., Faridabad v. ITO, Faridabad

ITA 6620/DEL/2014 | 2008-2009
Pronouncement Date: 13-11-2017 | Result: Dismissed

Appeal Details

RSA Number 662020114 RSA 2014
Assessee PAN AAECA7468B
Bench Delhi
Appeal Number ITA 6620/DEL/2014
Duration Of Justice 2 year(s) 11 month(s) 8 day(s)
Appellant M/s. Agico Controls Pvt. Ltd., Faridabad
Respondent ITO, Faridabad
Appeal Type Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date 13-11-2017
Appeal Filed By Assessee
Tags No record found
Order Result Dismissed
Bench Allotted A
Tribunal Order Date 13-11-2017
Assessment Year 2008-2009
Appeal Filed On 05-12-2014
Judgment Text
PAGE 1 OF 3 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH A: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 6620/DEL/2014 A.Y.: 2008-09 M/S AGICO CONTROLS PRIVATE LIMITED VS. ITO WARD 11 (1) C/O KAILASH CHAND GUPTA CGO COMPLEX CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT NH-4 FARIDABAD B-84 1 ST FLOOR HARYANA NEHRU GROUND NIT FARIDABAD HARYANA (PAN: AAECA7468B) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE DEPARTMENT BY : SH. ARUN KUMAR YADAV SR. DR O R D E R PER H.S. SIDHU JM THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINS T THE ORDER DATED 24.9.2014 OF THE LD. CIT(A) FARIDABAD RELEVANT TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-09. 2. IN THIS CASE THE NOTICE WAS SENT TO THE ASSESSE E FOR HEARING BY REGD. AD POST FOR TODAY I.E. 13.11.2017 AT THE ADDRE SS MENTIONED IN FORM NO. 36 VIDE COLUMN NO. 10. 3. ON 13.11.2017 NEITHER THE ASSESSEE NOR ITS AUTH ORISED REPRESENTATIVE ATTENDED THE HEARING AND ALSO NOT FILE D ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT BY THE ASSESSEE HENCE WE ARE OF T HE VIEW THAT NO USEFUL PURPOSE WOULD BE SERVED TO SEND THE NOTICE AG AIN AND AGAIN TO THE ASSESSEE. IN VIEW OF ABOVE IT IS THUS INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTION OF ITS APPEAL. PAGE 2 OF 3 4. HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF ITAT RULES AND FOLL OWING VARIOUS DECISIONS OF DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL INCLUDING T HAT OF MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD. : 38 ITD 320 (DELHI) AND HONBLE MADHYA PRAD ESH HIGH COURTS DECISION IN ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT; 223 ITR 480 (MP) WE TREAT THIS APPEAL AS UNADMITTED AND DISM ISS THE SAME. WE WOULD LIKE TO CLARIFY THAT SUBSEQUENTLY IF THE AS SESSEE EXPLAINS THE REASONS FOR NON APPEARANCE AND IF THE BENCH IS SO SAT ISFIED THE MATTER MAY BE RECALLED FOR THE PURPOSE OF ADJUDICATION OF THE APPEAL. 5. IN THE RESULT THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED IN LIMINE. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON 13-11-2017. SD/- SD/- [PRASHANT MAHARISHI] [H.S. SIDHU] ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATE:13/11/2017 SRBHATNAGAR COPY FORWARDED TO: - 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4.CIT (A) 5. DR ITAT TRUE COPY BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT DELHI BENCHES PAGE 3 OF 3