M/S JAIPUR COLONIZERS & DEVELOPERS, JAIPUR v. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6-2, JAIPUR

ITA 674/JPR/2017 | 2012-2013
Pronouncement Date: 25-11-2019 | Result: Partly Allowed

Our System has flagged this appeal as eligible for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. If you are party to this appeal, get on a Free Consultation Call with our team of Legal Experts who shall guide you as to how you can save huge Interest and Penalty in VSV Scheme.


Apply Now
        
Try VSV Calculator

Appeal Details

RSA Number 67423114 RSA 2017
Assessee PAN AAIFJ2740E
Bench Jaipur
Appeal Number ITA 674/JPR/2017
Duration Of Justice 2 year(s) 2 month(s) 27 day(s)
Appellant M/S JAIPUR COLONIZERS & DEVELOPERS, JAIPUR
Respondent INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6-2, JAIPUR
Appeal Type Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date 25-11-2019
Appeal Filed By Assessee
Order Result Partly Allowed
Bench Allotted A
Tribunal Order Date 25-11-2019
Last Hearing Date 04-10-2017
First Hearing Date 04-10-2017
Assessment Year 2012-2013
Appeal Filed On 28-08-2017
Judgment Text
VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL JAIPUR BENCH A JAIPUR JH JESK LH-'KEKZ] YS[KK LNL; OA JH FOT; IKY JKO] U;KF;D LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE : SHRI RAMESH C.SHARMA AM & SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO JM VK;DJ VIHY LA-@ ITA NO. 674/JP/2017 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2012-13 M/S. JAIPUR COLONIZERS & DEVELOPERS 404 4 TH FLOOR MILESTONE BUILDING GANDHI NAGAR MODE TONK ROAD JAIPUR CUKE VS. THE ITO WARD- 6(2) JAIPUR LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO .: AAIFJ 2740 E VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS@ ASSESSEE BY : SHRI MANISH AGARWAL CA JKTLO DH VKSJ LS@ REVENUE BY: SHRI K.C. GUPTA JCIT-DR LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 25/11/2019 ?KKS'K .KK DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 25/11/2019 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER RAMESH C. SHARMA AM THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A)-2 JAIPUR DATED 20-03-2017 FOR THE ASSESS MENT YEAR 2012-13 IN THE MATTER OF ORDER PASSED U/S 143 (3) OF THE I. T. ACT 1961. 2.1 THE MAIN GRIEVANCE OF THE ASSESSEE RELATES TO P ASSING OF EX-PARTE ORDER BY THE LD. CIT(A) WITHOUT GIVING PROPER OPPO RTUNITY OF HEARING. 2.2 DURING THE COURSE OF HEARING THE LD.AR OF THE ASSESSEE PLACED ON RECORD THE AFFIDAVIT MENTIONING THEREIN THAT THE NO TICE ISSUED BY THE LD. CIT(A) WAS NOT SERVED UPON THE ASSESSEE. THEREFORE THE ASSESSEE WAS NOT ITA NO.674/JP/2017 M/S. JAIPUR COLONIZERS & DEVELOPERS VS ITO WARD-6(2) JAIPUR 2 ABLE TO APPEAR BEFORE THE LD. CIT(A) ON THE DATE OF HEARING OF APPEAL. THE CONTENTS OF THE AFFIDAVIT PLACED BEFORE US ARE AS U NDER:- I PANKAJ MEENA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS S/O SHRI RAT I RAM MEENA R/O C-108 J.P. COLONY TONK PHATAK JAIPUR DO HEREBY SOLEMNLY AFFIRM ON OATH AS UNDER: 1. THAT I AM ONE OF THE PARTNERS OF M/S JAIPUR COLONISERS& DEVELOPERS PRESENTLY HAVING ITS PLACE O F BUSINESS AT 202 2 ND FLOOR UDB TOWER OPP. NAGAR NIGAM TONK ROAD JAI PUR. 2. THAT AN APPEAL AGAINST THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DAT ED 25.03.2015 WAS FILED BEFORE LD. CIT(A)-2 JAIPUR ON 30.04.2015 WHICH WAS DECIDED EX-PARTE AS THE SAID ORDER HAD NE VER REACHED THE APPELLANT COMPANY. 3. THAT LATER WHEN ASSESSEE WAS ASKED TO DEPOSIT T HE DEMAND THE FACT THAT THE APPEAL ORDER HAS ALREADY BEEN PASSED BY CIT(A)-II JAIPUR ON 20.03.2017 CAME TO KNOWLEDGE O F APPELLANT AS THE APPELLATE ORDER WAS NEVER SERVED UPON/RECEIVED BY APPELLANT DUE TO CHANGE OF ADDRESS OF THE APPELLANT FIRM. 4. THAT AFTER COMING TO KNOW ABOUT THE DISMISSAL OF APPEAL BEING PASSED BY LD. CIT(A)-II EX-PARTE APP ELLANT REQUESTED ON 06.07.2017 ON SUPPLY THE CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER AS THE APPELLANT HAD NOT RECEIVED THE ORDER. 5. ON RECEIVING THE CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER THE AP PEAL WAS FILED BEFORE THE HONBLE BENCH. 6. THAT THE NON-PARTICIPATION IN THE APPELLATE PROC EEDINGS BEFORE LD. CIT(A) WAS INADVERTENT AND SOLELY FOR T HE REASON THAT THE NOTICES ISSUED WERE NEVER RECEIVED AS THE APPELLAN T'S ADDRESS HAD CHANGED AND FACT OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS IS ALSO EVIDE NT FROM THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE TAX RECOVERY OFFICER ON THE NEW ADDRE SS OF THE APPELLANT. 7. THAT THIS AFFIDAVIT IS GIVEN IN CONFIRMATION OF THE FACTS NARRATED IN THE WRITTEN SUBMISSION FILED BEFORE THE HONBLE BENCH REQUESTING TO KINDLY RESTORE THE MATTER BACK TO THE FILE OF LD. CIT(A) TO ADJUDICATE THE ISSUES INVOLVED ON MERITS. 2.3 WE HAVE CONSIDERED THE RIVAL CONTENTIONS AND GO NE THROUGH THE ORDERS OF THE LOWER AUTHORITIES. WE HAVE ALSO GONE THROUGH THE AFFIDAVIT OF THE ASSESSEE AND FOUND THAT DUE TO NON-SERVICE O F THE NOTICE THE ITA NO.674/JP/2017 M/S. JAIPUR COLONIZERS & DEVELOPERS VS ITO WARD-6(2) JAIPUR 3 ASSESSEE COULD NOT APPEAR BEFORE THE LD. CIT(A). TH US IN THE SUBSTANTIAL INTEREST OF JUSTICE WE RESTORE THE MATTER BACK TO THE FILE OF THE LD. CIT(A) FOR DECIDING THE SAME AFRESH ON MERIT BY PROVIDING ADEQUATE OPPORTUNITY OF BEING HEARD TO THE ASSESSEE. WE ALSO DIRECT THE ASSESSEE TO APPEAR BEFORE THE LD. CIT(A) WITHIN A PERIOD OF 2 MONTHS F ROM THE DATE OF RECEIPT OF THIS ORDER. THUS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS A LLOWED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. 3.0 IN THE RESULT THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS AL LOWED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES.. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 25 -11-20 19. SD/- SD/- FOT; IKY JKO JESK LH 'KEKZ (VIJAY PAL RAO) (RAMESH C. SHARMA) U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 25/11/ 2019 *MISHRA VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ@ THE APPELLANT- M/S. JAIPUR COLONIZERS & DEVELOPERS JAIPUR 2. IZR;FKHZ@ THE RESPONDENT- THE ITO WARD-6 (2) JAIPUR 3. VK;DJ VK;QDRVIHY ) @ CIT(A) 4. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ@ DR ITAT JAIPUR 6. XKMZ QKBZY@ GUARD FILE (ITA NO.674/JP/2017) VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASSISTANT. REGISTRAR