RSA Number | 689519914 RSA 2007 |
---|---|
Assessee PAN | AAFFM6597Q |
Bench | Mumbai |
Appeal Number | ITA 6895/MUM/2007 |
Duration Of Justice | 2 year(s) 2 month(s) 3 day(s) |
Appellant | M/S. MAHESH (INDIA) EXPORT IMPORT CO., MUMBAI |
Respondent | THE ITO WD 14(2), |
Appeal Type | Income Tax Appeal |
Pronouncement Date | 19-01-2010 |
Appeal Filed By | Assessee |
Order Result | Partly Allowed |
Bench Allotted | I |
Tribunal Order Date | 19-01-2010 |
Date Of Final Hearing | 04-01-2010 |
Next Hearing Date | 04-01-2010 |
Assessment Year | 2003-2004 |
Appeal Filed On | 16-11-2007 |
Judgment Text |
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH I MUMBAI. BEFORE SHRI SHRI J. SUDHAKAR REDDY ACCOUNTANT MEMB ER AND SHRI V.D. RAO JUDICIAL MEMBER. I.T.A. NO. 68 95/MUM/2007 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2003-04. MAHESH (INDIA) EXPORT IMPORT CO. TH E INCOME TAX OFFICER 808 COTTON EXCHANGE BLDG. VS. WARD-14(2) MUMBAI. KALBADEVI ROAD MUMBAI-400 002. PAN AAFFM6597Q. APPELLANT RESPONDENT I.T.A. NO. 7132/MUM/2007 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2003-04. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS. MAH ESH (INDIA) EXPORT 14(2) MUMBAI. IMPORT CO. MUMBAI. APPELLANT. RESPONDENT. ASSESSEE BY : NONE. DEPARTMENT BY : SHRI H.V. JAIN. O R D E R PER J. SUDHAKAR REDDY A.M. THESE ARE CROSS APPEALS AND ARE DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT(APPEALS)-XIV MUMBAI DATED 3 RD SEPT. 2007. 2. NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE DESPITE ISSUAL OF NOTICE BY RPAD. ON EARLIER OCCASIONS ALSO NONE APPE ARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE DESPITE NOTICE BY RPAD. THERE IS NO V AKALATNAMA FILED BY ANY COUNSEL NOR HAVE WE RECEIVED ANY REQUEST FOR AD JOURNMENT. UNDER 2 THESE CIRCUMSTANCES WE DISPOSE OF THE CASE EXPARTE QUA THE ASSESSEE AFTER HEARING THE LEARNED DR. 3. WE HAVE HEARD MR. H.V. JAIN LEARNED SR. AUTHOR ISED REPRESENTATIVE. 4. GROUND NO. 1 IN THE ASSESSEES APPEAL IS ON DEP B. THE ISSUE IS SET ASIDE TO THE FILE OF THE AO FOR FRESH ADJUDI CATION IN THE LINE OF THE DECISION OF SPECIAL BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CA SE OF TOPMAN EXPORTS VS. ITO (2009) 318 ITR (AT) 87 (MUMBAI). 5. REGARDING GROUND NOS. 2 TO 8 THE ASSESSEE AGIT ATES AGAINST ADHOC DISALLOWANCES AND ADDITIONS. IN THE ABSENCE O F ASSISTANCE FROM THE ASSESSEE WE DISMISS THESE GROUNDS FOR NON PROSECUT ION. 6. IN THE RESULT THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS PA RTLY ALLOWED. 7. COMING TO THE REVENUES APPEAL IT APPEARS THAT THE MAIN GRIEVANCE OF THE REVENUE IS THAT THE CIT(APPEALS) H AS ADMITTED CERTAIN EVIDENCES WITHOUT GIVING AN OPPORTUNITY TO THE AO I N VIOLATION OF RULE 46A. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE WE SET ASIDE THE MATTER TO THE FILE OF THE AO FOR FRESH ADJUDICATION. 8. IN THE RESULT THE REVENUES APPEAL IS ALLOWED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON THIS 19 TH DAY OF JANUARY 2010. SD/- SD/- (V.D. RAO) (J. SUDHAKARY REDDY) JUDICIAL MEMBER. ACCOUNTANT MEMBER. MUMBAI DATED : 19 TH JANUARY 2010. WAKODE 3 COPY FORWARDED TO : 1. APPLICANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. C.I.T. 4. CIT(A) 5. DR I-BENCH (TRUE COPY) BY ORDER ASSTT.REGISTRAR ITAT MUMBAI BENCHES
|