M/s. GILTEDGE FINANCIAL & MANAGEMENT SERVICES, MUMBAI v. ITO 4(1)(2), MUMBAI

ITA 7044/MUM/2006 | 2002-2003
Pronouncement Date: 17-03-2011 | Result: Dismissed

Appeal Details

RSA Number 704419914 RSA 2006
Bench Mumbai
Appeal Number ITA 7044/MUM/2006
Duration Of Justice 4 year(s) 2 month(s) 22 day(s)
Appellant M/s. GILTEDGE FINANCIAL & MANAGEMENT SERVICES, MUMBAI
Respondent ITO 4(1)(2), MUMBAI
Appeal Type Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date 17-03-2011
Appeal Filed By Assessee
Order Result Dismissed
Bench Allotted G
Tribunal Order Date 17-03-2011
Date Of Final Hearing 24-06-2015
Next Hearing Date 24-06-2015
Assessment Year 2002-2003
Appeal Filed On 26-12-2006
Judgment Text
I.T.A NO.7044/ MUM/2006 GILTEDGE FINANCIAL & MANAGEMENT SERVICES 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL G BENCH MUMBAI. BEFORE SHRI R.V.EASWAR PRESIDENT AND SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A NO.7044/ MUM/2006 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2002-03 GILTEDGE FINANCIAL & MANAGEMENT SERVICES .. APP ELLANT 103 LIBERTY APT 80-A SAROJINI ROAD VILE PARLE(W) MUMBAI PA NO.AABCG 1699K VS INCOME TAX OFFICER 4(1)(2) . RESPONDENT MUMBAI. APPEARANCES: NONE FOR THE APPELLANT ASHIMA GUPTA FOR THE RESPONDENT O R D E R PER PRAMOD KUMAR: 1. THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED A GAINST THE ORDER DATED 4 TH SEPTEMBER 2006 OF THE CIT (A)-IV MUMBAI FOR THE ASSESSMENT Y EAR 2002-03. 2. THE HEARING OF APPEAL IN THIS CASE IS BEING ADJO URNED FROM TIME TO TIME AT THE REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEE. FINALLY IT WAS FIXED FOR 15.12.2010 AND THE HEARING WAS ALSO ADJOURNED AT THE REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEE TO 17.3.20 11. BOTH THE PARTIES WERE INFORMED AT THE TIME OF HEARING. HOWEVER ON 17.3.2011 WHEN T HE MATTER WAS CALLED ON FOR HEARING NO ONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR WAS ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT FILED. IT IS THEREFORE INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERES TED IN PURSUING THE APPEAL WHICH IS HEREBY DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION FOLLOWING THE JUDGMEN T OF HONBLE BOMBAY HIGH COURT IN THE I.T.A NO.7044/ MUM/2006 GILTEDGE FINANCIAL & MANAGEMENT SERVICES 2 CASE OF CHEMIPOL V UOI DATED 17 TH SEPTEMBER 2009 (BHC) AND ALSO THE DECISION OF DE LHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIP LAN INDIA (P) LTD. (1991) 38 ITD 320 (DEL). 3. IN THE RESULT APPEAL IS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF P ROSECUTION. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 17 TH MARCH 2011 SD/- (R.V.EASWAR) PRESIDENT SD/- (PRAMOD KUMAR) (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) MUMBAI DATED 17 TH MARCH 2011 PARIDA COPY TO: 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) IV MUMBAI 4. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 4 MUMBAI 5. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE BENCH G MUMBAI //TRUE COPY// BY ORDER ASSTT. REGISTRAR ITAT MUMBAI I.T.A NO.7044/ MUM/2006 GILTEDGE FINANCIAL & MANAGEMENT SERVICES 3