Appeal Details
| RSA Number | 83724514 RSA 2010 |
|---|---|
| Assessee PAN | AABCV7236R |
| Bench | Pune |
| Appeal Number | ITA 837/PUN/2010 |
| Duration Of Justice | 1 year(s) 6 month(s) 22 day(s) |
| Appellant | Vikrant Auto Indutries Private Ltd, Pune |
| Respondent | ITO, Pune |
| Appeal Type | Income Tax Appeal |
| Pronouncement Date | 23-12-2011 |
| Appeal Filed By | Assessee |
| Order Result | Dismissed |
| Bench Allotted | A |
| Tribunal Order Date | 23-12-2011 |
| Date Of Final Hearing | 22-12-2011 |
| Next Hearing Date | 22-12-2011 |
| Assessment Year | 2006-2007 |
| Appeal Filed On | 01-06-2010 |
| Judgment Text |
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH A PUNE BEFORE SHRI SHAILENDRA KUMAR YADAV JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G.S. PANNU ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. NO. 837/PN/2010 : A.Y. 2006-07 VIKRANT AUTO INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. 55/1/2 PUNE SATARA ROAD PUNE-411 046 PAN AABCV 7236 R APPELLANT VS. I.T.O. WARD 7(3) PUNE RESPONDENT APPELLANT BY: NONE RESPONDENT BY: SHRI S.K. AMBASTHA DATE OF HEARING: 22-12-2011 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 22-12-2011 ORDER PER SHAILENDRA KUMAR YADAV JM THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDERS OF THE CIT-(A)-III PUNE DATED 3-2-2010 FOR A .Y. 2006- 07 ON VARIOUS GROUNDS. 2. THIS APPEAL WAS ORIGINALLY FIXED FOR HEARING ON 21-11- 2011 WHICH WAS ADJOURNED AT THE INSTANCE OF ASSESSE E AND THE SAME WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 22-12-2011 FOR WH ICH A NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SENT THROUGH RPAD ON 21-10-20 11. HOWEVER NONE APPEARED TO SUPPORT THE CASE ON BEHA LF OF THE ASSESSEE WHEN THE APPEAL CAME UP FOR HEARING ON 22- 12-2011 NOR ANY ADJOURNMENT APPLICATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED. UNDER THESE CIRCUMSTANCES IT MAY BE REAS ONABLY CONCLUDED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PU RSUING THIS APPEAL. IN SUCH CASES THE COURTS/TRIBUNAL HA VE 2 ITA NO. 837/PN/2010 VIKRANT AUTO INDUSTRIES A.Y. 2006-07 INHERENT POWERS TO DISMISS THE APPEAL FOR NON-PROSE CUTION AS HELD BY HONBLE BOMBAY HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF CHEMIPOL VS. UNION OF INDIA IN EXCISE APPEAL NO. 62 OF 2009. ON THE FACTS OF THE CASE WE ARE CONVINCED T HAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING THIS APPEAL. WE THEREFORE DISMISS THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE AS UNADMITTED WITH A LIBERTY TO RECALL THIS MATTER WIT HIN A REASONABLE TIME AS PER THE PROVISIONS OF RULE 24 OF INCOME- TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RULES 1963 AFTER SHOWING SU FFICIENT AND REASONABLE CAUSE FOR NON-APPEARANCE ON THE DATE OF HEARING FIXED ON 22-12-2011. 3. IN THE RESULT THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE STANDS DISMISSED. DECISION PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT IMMEDIATELY O N CONCLUSION OF THE HEARING ON 22 ND DECEMBER 2011. SD/- SD/- G.S. PANNU SHAILENDRA KUMAR YADAV ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER PUNE DATED THE 23 RD DECEMBER 2011 ANKAM COPY OF THE ORDER IS FORWARDED TO : 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. THE CIT-(A)-III I PUNE 4. THE CIT IV PUNE 5. THE D.R ITAT PUNE BENCH PUNE 6. GUARD FILE BY ORDER SR. PRIVATE SECRETARY INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
|