Indutch Composites Technology Pvt. Ltd., Vadodara v. The Jt.CIT TDS, Vadodara

ITA 945/AHD/2019 | 2016-2017
Pronouncement Date: 09-03-2021 | Result: Dismissed

Appeal Details

RSA Number 94520514 RSA 2019
Assessee PAN AACCI2331P
Bench Ahmedabad
Appeal Number ITA 945/AHD/2019
Duration Of Justice 1 year(s) 9 month(s) 9 day(s)
Appellant Indutch Composites Technology Pvt. Ltd., Vadodara
Respondent The Jt.CIT TDS, Vadodara
Appeal Type Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date 09-03-2021
Appeal Filed By Assessee
Order Result Dismissed
Bench Allotted B
Tribunal Order Date 09-03-2021
Assessment Year 2016-2017
Appeal Filed On 28-05-2019
Judgment Text
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD B BENCH ( CONVENED THROUGH VIRTUAL COURT ) BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH ACCOUNTANT MEMBER S.NO APPEAL A.Y. APPELLANT (PAN NO.) RESPONDENT A.R. 1 ITA NO. 945/AHD/2019 2016-17 M/S. INDUTCH COMPOSITES TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD. (AACCI2331P) JT. CIT- TDS BARODA MS. KINJAL V. SHAH 2 ITA NOS. 546/ AHD/2019 2013-14 INDONET PLASTIC INDUSTRIES (AACFI3883M) ITO WARD- 1(2)(4) VADODARA MS. KINAJAL V. SHAH 3 ITA NO. 2196 /AHD/2015 2014-15 MINALBHAI JAYANTIBHAI PATEL (AJBPP4996Q) THE ITO WARD-3(3)(3) AHMEDABAD SHRI TUSHAR HEMANI & SHRI P. B. PARMAR REVENUE BY : SHRI R. R. MAKWANA SR. D.R. / DATE OF HEARING 08/03/2021 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 09/03/2021 / O R D E R PER BENCH THE CAPTIONED THREE APPEALS ARISE FROM THE RESPECTIVE ORDERS OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) (CIT(A)) AGAINST DIFFERENT ASSESSMENT YEARS. 2. THE CAPTIONED ASSESSEES HAVE SOUGHT TO WITHDRAW THE APPEALS LISTED ABOVE ON THE GROUND THAT THEY HAVE OPTED TO AVAIL ITA NO. 945/AHD/19 & 2 ORS. - 2 - BENEFITS OF VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME 2020 (VSV). WHEN THE MATTER WAS CALLED FOR HEARING THE LD. COUNSELS FOR THE ASSESSEE AT THE OUTSET HAVE SUBMITTED THAT THEY DO NOT SEEK TO PURSUE THE SAID APPEALS OWING TO EXERCISE OF OPTION FOR AVAILING VSV SCHEME AND CONSEQUENTLY REQUESTED THAT THEIR APPLICATIONS FOR WITHDRAWAL OF APPEALS MAY PLEASE BE GRANTED. REFERENCE WAS ALSO MADE TO WRITTEN REQUESTS IN THIS REGARD. 3. THE LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE REVENUE STATED THAT HE HAS NO OBJECTION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEALS IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES NARRATED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. 4. IN THE LIGHT OF ORAL/WRITTEN REQUESTS MADE ON BEHALF OF THE CAPTIONED PARTIES ALL THE APPEALS ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. HOWEVER IN THE EVENT THE ASSESSEE FAILS TO AVAIL THE BENEFIT OF VSV SCHEME FOR ANY BONAFIDE REASONS THEN THE ASSESSEE CONCERNED WILL BE AT LIBERTY TO SEEK RESTORATION OF ORIGINAL APPEALS FOR HEARING BEFORE ITAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. 5. IN THE RESULT ALL CAPTIONED APPEALS ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. SD/- SD/- (AMARJIT SINGH) (MAHAVIR PRASAD) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER TRUE COPY JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMEDABAD: DATED 09/03/2021 RAJESH KUMAR / COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO:- 1. / REVENUE 2. / ASSESSEE 3. / CONCERNED CIT 4. - / CIT (A) THIS ORDER PRONOUNCED ON 09/03/2021