Kiran Devi, v. ACIT CC-14,

MA 283/DEL/2010 | 1999-2000
Pronouncement Date: 18-03-2011 | Result: Dismissed

Appeal Details

RSA Number 28320124 RSA 2010
Assessee PAN ITANO1130T
Bench Delhi
Appeal Number MA 283/DEL/2010
Duration Of Justice 9 month(s)
Appellant Kiran Devi,
Respondent ACIT CC-14,
Appeal Type Miscellaneous Application
Pronouncement Date 18-03-2011
Appeal Filed By Assessee
Order Result Dismissed
Bench Allotted D
Tribunal Order Date 18-03-2011
Assessment Year 1999-2000
Appeal Filed On 18-06-2010
Judgment Text
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH C NEW DELHI) BEFORE SHRI I.P. BANSAL JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI A.K. GARODIA ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MISC. APPLICATION NOS. 283 TO 288/DEL/2010 I.T.A. NO.1130 TO 1135 /DEL/2008 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 1999-00 TO 2004-05 SMT.KIRAN DEVI ACIT F-1U-1123 PITAMPURA CENTRAL CIRCLE-14 DELHI. V. NEW DELHI. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : SHRI K. SAMPATH ADVOCATE. RESPONDENT BY : SHRI AK MONGA SR. DR. ORDER PER A.K. GARODIA AM: ALL THESE SIX MISC. APPLICATIONS ARE FILED BY THE ASSESSEE POINTING OUT CERTAIN MISTAKES IN THE COMBINED TRIBUNAL ORDER DATED 7.8.2009 FOR ASSESSMENT YEARS 1999-00 TO 2004-05. 2. IN THE COURSE OF HEARING BEFORE US LD AR OF THE A SSESSEE SUBMITTED A COPY OF JUDGMENT OF HON'BLE DELHI HIGH C OURT DATED 26.8.2010 IN I.T.A. NOS. 1217 1219 1220 1221 123 1 & 1233 OF 2010 AND SUBMITTED THAT AGAINST THIS IMPUGNED COMBINED TRIB UNAL ORDER DATED 7.8.2009 THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED APPEAL BEFORE HON 'BLE DELHI HIGH COURT U/S 260A AND ALL THESE SIX APPEALS OF THE ASSE SSEE BEFORE HON'BLE DELHI HIGH COURT HAD BEEN ADMITTED AND NOTI CES WERE ISSUED TO THE REVENUE. IT IS SUBMITTED THAT IN VIEW OF THIS JUDG MENT OF HON'BLE DELHI HIGH COURT ADMITTING THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE THESE SIX MISC. PAGE 2 OF 3 MA NOS.283 TO 288 IN ITA NO1130 TO 1135/DEL/08 APPLICATIONS OF THE ASSESSEE HAVE BECOME INFRUCTUOUS BEC AUSE NOW THE CORRECTNESS OR OTHERWISE OF THIS COMBINED TRIBUNAL ORDER HAS TO BE EXAMINED AND DECIDED BY HON'BLE DELHI HIGH COURT. L D DR OF THE REVENUE ALSO SUBMITTED THAT UNDER THIS FACTUAL POSITION THESE MISC. APPLICATIONS OF THE ASSESSEE SHOULD BE DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUO US. 3. WE HAVE HEARD BOTH SIDES AND HAVE GONE THROUGH THE DECISION OF HON'BLE DELHI HIGH COURT DATED 26.8.2010 AS PER WHIC H HON'BLE DELHI HIGH COURT HAS ADMITTED THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE FOR D ECISION AND HENCE THESE MISC. APPLICATIONS OF THE ASSESSEE HAVE BECOME INFRUCTUOUS. WE THEREFORE DISMISS THE SAME AS INFRUCTUO US. 4. IN THE RESULT ALL THE SIX MISC. APPLICATIONS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE DISMISSED. 5. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THE DATE O F HEARING I.E. 18 TH MARCH 2011. SD/- SD/- (I.P. BANSAL) (A.K. GAR ODIA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DT. 18.3.2011. HMS COPY FORWARDED TO:- 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. THE CIT 4. THE CIT (A)- NEW DELHI. 5. THE DR ITAT LOKNAYAK BHAWAN KHAN MARKET NEW DEL HI. TRUE COPY. BY ORDER (ITAT NEW DELHI). PAGE 3 OF 3 MA NOS.283 TO 288 IN ITA NO1130 TO 1135/DEL/08