DCIT, Ranchi v. Pramod Kumar Jaiswal,, Ranchi

MA 7/RAN/2012 | 1991-1992
Pronouncement Date: 28-11-2014

Appeal Details

RSA Number 725124 RSA 2012
Bench Ranchi
Appeal Number MA 7/RAN/2012
Duration Of Justice 2 year(s) 9 month(s) 7 day(s)
Appellant DCIT, Ranchi
Respondent Pramod Kumar Jaiswal,, Ranchi
Appeal Type Miscellaneous Application
Pronouncement Date 28-11-2014
Appeal Filed By Department
Bench Allotted DB
Tribunal Order Date 28-11-2014
Assessment Year 1991-1992
Appeal Filed On 20-02-2012
Judgment Text
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CIRCUIT BENCH RANCHI BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI H.L. KARWA PRESIDENT AND HON'BLE SHRI B.R. BASKARAN ACCOUNTANT MEMBER M.A. NO. 07 /RAN/ 12 [ ARISING OUT OF IT A NO. 580 / RAN / 2006 A.Y 1991 - 92 ] D .C.I.T C ENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 RANCHI VS. PRAMOD KUMAR JAISWAL ( APPLICANT ) ( RESPONDENT ) FOR THE DEPARTMENT : SHRI DEEPAK ROSHAN SR.S.C/LD.DR FOR THE APPLICANT/ASSESSEE : S/SHRI S.K PODDAR & M.K. CHOUDHARY ADVOCATES LD.AR DATE OF HEARING : 28 - 11 - 2014 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 28 - 11 - 2014 O R D E R B.R. BASKARAN ACCOUNTANT MEMBER : TH E REVENUE HAS FILED THIS MISCEL LANEOUS APPLICATION REQUESTING THE BENCH TO VACATE THE ORDER DATED 12 - 07 - 2011PASSED BY THE TRIBUNAL IN ITA NO.580/RAN/2006 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEA 1991 - 92 WHEREIN COST OF RS.500/ - PER APP EAL WAS AWARDED BY THE CO - ORDINATE BENCH OF THIS TRIBUNAL ON THE R EVENUE FOR SEEKING ADJOURNMENT. 2. THE LD.DR SUBMITTED THAT THE REVENUE HAS SOUGHT ADJOURNMENT ONLY ONE OCCASION I.E ON 12 - 07 - 2011 S INCE THE REVENUE HAD ENGAGED SHRI K.K. BAJORIA SENIOR STANDING COUNSEL TO REPRESENT THE CASE AND SINCE HE WAS NOT REA DY ON THE DATE OF HEARING I.E. ON 12 - 07 - 2011 L D.DR PRAYED BEFORE US THAT THERE WAS REASONABLE CAUSE FOR SEEKING ADJOURNMENT ON THAT DATE I.E. 12 - 07 - 20 11. ACCORDINGLY HE PRAYED THAT THE COST OF RS.500/ - PER APPEAL AWARDED BY THE CO - ORDINATE OF THIS TRI BUNAL BENCH BE VACATED . 3. WE HAVE HEARD THE LD.AR AND PERUSED THE RECORD. ADMITTEDLY COST OF RS.500/ - HAS BEEN AWARDED BY THE CO - ORDINATE BENCH OF THIS TRIBUNAL. HOWEVER ANY INTERFERENCE IN THE ORDER SO PASSED WOULD AMOUNT TO REVIEW OF THE SAME PAGE NO. 2 MA NO. 07/RAN/12 [I TA NO.580/RAN/06 PRAMOD KR. JAISWAL WHICH THE TRIBUNAL HAS NOT EMPOWERED TO DO SO U/S. 254(2) OF THE ACT . ACCORDINGLY WE ARE UNABLE TO ACCEPT THE REQUEST MADE BY THE REVENUE. 4. IN THE RESULT THE MISC. APPLICATION FILED U/S. 254(2) OF THE ACT BY THE REVENUE IS DISMISSED. PRONOUNCED ACCORD INGLY ON 28 - 11 - 2014 SD/ - SD/ - [ H.L. KARWA ] [ B.R. BASKARAN ] PRESIDENT ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DT. 2 8 - 11 - 2014 PLACE : RAN CHI PP SR. PS COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. THE APPLICANT : THE D CIT CENTRAL CIR - 2 RANCHI . 2 THE RESPONDENT: SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR JAISWAL 3. .THE CIT 4.THE CIT(A) 5.DR ITAT CIRCUIT BENCH RANCHI 6. GUARD FILE. TRUE COPY BY ORDER ASSTT. REGISTRAR PAGE NO. 3 MA NO. 07/RAN/12 [I TA NO.580/RAN/06 PRAMOD KR. JAISWAL 1. DATE OF DICTATION ............. 2 8 - 11 - 2014 ....................... 2. DATE ON WHICH THE TYPED DRAFT IS PLACED BEFORE THE DICTATING MEMBER ........................OTHER MEMBER ...... - 11 - 2014 ............. ........... 3. DATE ON WHICH THE APPROVED DRAFT COMES TO THE SR. P.S./P.S. ..................... 4. DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER IS PLACED BEFORE THE DICTATING MEMBER FOR PRONOUNCEMENT.................................. 2 7 - 11 - 2014 ............................ ....................... 5. DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER COMES BACK TO THE SR. P.S./P.S ................ 6. DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE BENCH CLERK ....................................... 7. DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE HEAD CLERK ............. ............................ 8. THE DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR FOR SIGNATURE ON THE ORDER ................................................................................................. 9. DATE OF DESPATCH OF THE ORDER ....... .......................................................